home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.new-world-order      You will own nothing... and be happy      25,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 23,730 of 25,344   
   LarryGraham to invalid@butterfly.net   
   Re: Hillary Clinton:: Gun Owners Can't B   
   13 May 14 12:52:17   
   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: GrandCentralStation@bass.gov   
      
   "_ G O D _"  wrote in message news:R%rcv.350606$pa5.18165@fx23.iad...   
      
   "Winston_Smith"  wrote in message   
   news:7t42n915v7ecqg4r266jmk92m39hnkpeqg@4ax.com...   
   > "_ G O D _" wrote:   
   >>"Winston_Smith"  wrote   
   >   
   >>>>> Other than your opinion, what makes   
   >>>>> them different than any other property?   
   >>   
   >>Stealing - is a criminal offence on its own.   
   >   
   > But you wrote:   
   > |-- >>>Possession of gun does not imply   
   > |-- >>>"criminal" but it defines ownership....   
   >   
   > You very clearly say possession of a gun   
   > defines ownership - even if it's stolen.   
   >   
      
   "Possession" in my context did not   
   imply neither "criminal" nor "stolen".   
   Why do you see things that are not   
   implied lest interpreted in this way?   
      
   #####   
   In "your context"?   Bwaaahahahahaa!   
   Why not instead, write like you had at least a 4th grade education, you   
   retard?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca