XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: aus.politics, can.politics, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: JQP@flashmail.com   
      
   On 5/22/2014 9:55 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > On 5/22/2014 3:34 AM, John Q. Public wrote:   
   >> On 5/20/2014 11:49 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>> On 5/20/2014 11:38 PM, pyotr filipivich wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>      They can't.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>      OTOH - they do have a say about what people can do in their   
   >>>> private establishment.   
   >>>>   
   >>> Can they violate the constitution or my rights in their establishment?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Your rights end where another person's rights begin.   
   >>   
   >> There are two conditions which define a Right...   
   >>   
   >> A Right is an action that an individual can exercise which does not   
   >> obligate   
   >> other individuals or infringe on their Rights.   
   >>   
   >> 1. a physical action must be initiated by an individual   
   >> 2. this action cannot obligate another individual or infringe his Rights   
   >>   
   >   
   > For example My carrying a gun into a restaurant violates no ones right   
   > since I had the right to bear arms....   
    >   
      
   True   
      
    >   
    >  The owner is obligated to   
   > respect a person of color or religion or other constitutional guarantees   
   > in that public place of business the same as my right to bear arms.   
   >   
      
   In states with concealed carry OR open carry laws, Chipoltes'   
   cannot prohibit armed customers. Chipolte made this incident an   
   issue because the lunkheads intentionally scared customers.   
      
   It was an obviously staged event designed to trigger controversy.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)