XPost: or.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.law-enforcement   
   XPost: alt.prisons, alt.revisionism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: otterpower@xhotmail.com   
      
   On 8/3/2014 7:23 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:   
   > They are not criminals.   
   >   
   > Even were they adults, presenting yourself to immigration in the wrong   
   > place or at the wrong time is a misdemeanor not a crime.   
      
   1:  a crime less serious than a felony --Merriam-Webster   
      
   > Just as the National Guard has no jurisdiction or powers to detain   
   > refugees.   
      
   When the National Guard is activated, it can and has taken into custody   
   any and all persons, if ordered to do so.   
      
      
   >   
   > The law requires that these minors be sheltered while they await legal   
   > determinations about whether they have an asylum claim because they   
   > are being persecuted in their home countries.   
      
   DACA is not a law.   
   ]   
      
   > “The children fleeing violence in Central America are seeking out   
   > border patrol agents. They are not trying to evade them. Why send   
   > soldiers to confront these kids?   
      
   So that they can be taken into custody more quickly and safely on their   
   way back to their homelands.   
      
   >   
   > Some sheriffs near the border note that National Guard troops would   
   > not be authorized to detain people, and that funds would be better   
   > spent on more local deputies and equipment.   
      
   "Some sheriffs near the border" lack experience and/or knowledge of the   
   actions of National Guard and other troops on American soil.   
   >   
   >   
   > Perry’s move could also run into constitutional problems. The   
   > Constitution’s Supremacy Clause prohibits states from interfering with   
   > areas of regulation that have been preempted by the federal   
   > government, and the U.S. Supreme Court has already invalidated   
   > provisions of state law that seek to legislate on immigration reform.   
   >   
   Jan Brewer's case made major strides in clarifying that, and the   
   sweeping overstatement about pre-emption is belied by the prevailing   
   interpretations of the law.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)