XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: Lyons@bass.gov"   
      
   "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   news:XnsA3B26B4395D29Hopewell@216.166.97.131...   
      
   Just Wondering  wrote in   
   news:5422fc1f$0$16445$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:   
      
   > On 9/24/2014 11:00 AM, deep wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:12:30 -0700, "Wayne"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and man B has the   
   >>> right to marry a woman.   
   >>>   
   >>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man A has a right   
   >>> to marry man B?   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >> Because they are still people.   And the law says we have the   
   >> responsibility to treat all people equally.   
   >>   
   > We already do.  All people have always had the right to marry.   
   > Marriage by definition is between a man and a woman.   
      
   Marriage between  a man and woman is a religious construct for the   
   purposes of procreation.   
      
   ####   
   I disagree.   
   My wife (a female) and I (a male)  are are not religious, nor did we want to   
   make children.   
     We fuck, because its fun!   
   We married, because we wanted to!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)