XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: davidjhughes.tx@netzero.com   
      
   On 9/24/2014 3:40 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > On 9/24/2014 8:58 AM, David J. Hughes wrote:   
   >> On 9/23/2014 12:57 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>> On 9/23/2014 11:27 AM, Lee wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> La. state judge: Gay marriage ban unconstitutional   
   >>>> Sept 22 2014   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage is   
   >>>> unconstitutional, in part because it   
   >>>> violates equal protection rights, a state   
   >>>> judge ruled Monday.   
   >>>   
   >>> Protection of what right?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Fourteenth Amendment, section one   
   >> "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to   
   >> the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the   
   >> State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which   
   >> shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United   
   >> States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or   
   >> property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its   
   >> jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."   
   >>   
   >> Contract laws, of which marriage laws are a subset, should not   
   >> discriminate on anything other than the ability to consent or enter into   
   >> a valid contract.   
   >   
   > Can't discriminate against someone entering into a contract... proof is   
   > that marriage is a contract and your judge says that marriage being   
   > limited to one group is discrimination. And Liberals have and will try   
   > to get abortion for 12 year old kids and if they can make a decision on   
   > human life and death as in abortion without parental notification, how   
   > can you ARGUE IN THE SUPREME COURT THAT THE SAME KIDS CAN'T MAKE A   
   > DECISION FOR MARRIAGE?   
   >   
   > I'd like to hear that argument...   
   >   
   >   
   >>>> Judge Edward Rubin said the ban violated   
   >>>> the 14th Amendment and the constitutional   
   >>>> requirement that states give "full faith   
   >>>> and credit" to each other's laws. His   
   >>>> ruling came in same-sex adoption case of   
   >>>> Angela Costanza and her partner, Chasity   
   >>>> Brewer.   
   >   
   > AND AS HE SAYS ABOVE   
   > It only take one State to say that a child can get an abortion at 12   
   > years old without parental consent and then all 50 States have to go   
   > along with that. And it opens the door to a 12 year old to make the   
   > claim that they can marry since it's no more difficult a decision than   
   > an abortion is.  And that is legal pedophilia marriage.  Thanks to   
   > Democrats.   
   >   
      
   Likewise, it only takes one state to say that everyone must commit   
   suicide on their 30th birthday to make it a requirement in all 50 states   
   (see the novel "Logan's Run).   
   That's roughly as likely as the scenario you propose.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)