XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: ingilt@yahoo.co.uk   
      
   On 24/09/2014 19:21, RD Sandman wrote:   
   > "Alex W."  wrote in news:c8gb9qFu4l0U1   
   > @mid.individual.net:   
   >   
   >> On 24/09/2014 18:45, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>> "Wayne"  wrote in   
   >>> news:lvun18$9r0$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and man B has the   
   >>>> right to marry a woman.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man A has a right to   
   >>>> marry man B?   
   >>>   
   >>> If he does, exactly what threat does that make to YOUR marriage?  One   
   >>> thing in their favor.....they cannot reproduce....they have to adopt   
   > to   
   >>> have chidren.  Lesbians also have to adopt or be artificially   
   >>> inseminated.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Plus, there's less chance of either of them becoming a burden on the   
   >> community.   
   >   
   > It actually assists our community since it is another child who will not   
   > be on welfare or homeless.   
      
   It's beneficial even without children: statistically, single people are   
   unhappier and sicker.   
      
   On top of that, the community benefits from the effective increase in   
   purchasing power of a steady couple.  Expenses are shared, thereby   
   increasing disposable income.  If and when they are married, they also   
   get easier access to credit and other financial services.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)