XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: davidjhughes.tx@netzero.com   
      
   On 9/24/2014 1:54 PM, Leo Lyons@bass.gov wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   > news:XnsA3B26B4395D29Hopewell@216.166.97.131...   
   >   
   > Just Wondering  wrote in   
   > news:5422fc1f$0$16445$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:   
   >   
   >> On 9/24/2014 11:00 AM, deep wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 08:12:30 -0700, "Wayne"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and man B has the   
   >>>> right to marry a woman.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man A has a right   
   >>>> to marry man B?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> Because they are still people.   And the law says we have the   
   >>> responsibility to treat all people equally.   
   >>>   
   >> We already do.  All people have always had the right to marry.   
   >> Marriage by definition is between a man and a woman.   
   >   
   > Marriage between  a man and woman is a religious construct for the   
   > purposes of procreation.   
   >   
   > ####   
   > I disagree.   
   > My wife (a female) and I (a male)  are are not religious, nor did we   
   > want to make children.   
   >   We fuck, because its fun!   
   > We married, because we wanted to!   
      
      
   And in so doing, gained certain privileges and immunities under the law.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)