Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.conspiracy.new-world-order    |    You will own nothing... and be happy    |    25,344 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,846 of 25,344    |
|    BeamMeUpScotty to David J. Hughes    |
|    Re: Louisiana Court Overturns Gay Marria    |
|    25 Sep 14 10:22:01    |
      IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov       XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism       XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration       XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism       XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival       From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.       BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov              On 9/25/2014 12:28 AM, David J. Hughes wrote:       > On 9/24/2014 3:40 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:       >> On 9/24/2014 8:58 AM, David J. Hughes wrote:       >>> On 9/23/2014 12:57 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:       >>>> On 9/23/2014 11:27 AM, Lee wrote:       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> La. state judge: Gay marriage ban unconstitutional       >>>>> Sept 22 2014       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage is       >>>>> unconstitutional, in part because it       >>>>> violates equal protection rights, a state       >>>>> judge ruled Monday.       >>>>       >>>> Protection of what right?       >>>>       >>>       >>> Fourteenth Amendment, section one       >>> "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to       >>> the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the       >>> State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which       >>> shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United       >>> States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or       >>> property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its       >>> jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."       >>>       >>> Contract laws, of which marriage laws are a subset, should not       >>> discriminate on anything other than the ability to consent or enter into       >>> a valid contract.       >>       >> Can't discriminate against someone entering into a contract... proof is       >> that marriage is a contract and your judge says that marriage being       >> limited to one group is discrimination. And Liberals have and will try       >> to get abortion for 12 year old kids and if they can make a decision on       >> human life and death as in abortion without parental notification, how       >> can you ARGUE IN THE SUPREME COURT THAT THE SAME KIDS CAN'T MAKE A       >> DECISION FOR MARRIAGE?       >>       >> I'd like to hear that argument...       >>       >>       >>>>> Judge Edward Rubin said the ban violated       >>>>> the 14th Amendment and the constitutional       >>>>> requirement that states give "full faith       >>>>> and credit" to each other's laws. His       >>>>> ruling came in same-sex adoption case of       >>>>> Angela Costanza and her partner, Chasity       >>>>> Brewer.       >>       >> AND AS HE SAYS ABOVE       >> It only take one State to say that a child can get an abortion at 12       >> years old without parental consent and then all 50 States have to go       >> along with that. And it opens the door to a 12 year old to make the       >> claim that they can marry since it's no more difficult a decision than       >> an abortion is. And that is legal pedophilia marriage. Thanks to       >> Democrats.       >>       >       > Likewise, it only takes one state to say that everyone must commit       > suicide on their 30th birthday to make it a requirement in all 50 states       > (see the novel "Logan's Run).       > That's roughly as likely as the scenario you propose.              All they have to do is make it legal and assisted and that's NOT near as       likely as something Democrats love like 12 year old kids getting       abortions without parental consent.              And didn't Washington State allow assisted suicide... Yepo a quick       search finds.       http://euthanasia.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000132                            It's already happening.... Suppose Washington sells a license for       assisted suicide can you then under this Judges ruling take that license       and force Utah to allow you to get assisted suicide in Utah?              Next is 12 year old kids getting abortions W/O parental notifications.       Then the ball is rolling....              --       --------------------------------------------------------------------       Help search the universe for an intelligent Liberal life form.       *THE UGLY STEP SISTER PROJECT NOT RELATED TO* (SETI)       Send BitCoin To: 1DYxrfVTdS1xhDJkhhrm1zb1cSYBYuUC4i       --------------------------------------------------------------------              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca