XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: ingilt@yahoo.co.uk   
      
   On Sun, 28 Sep 2014 10:18:44 -0700, Wayne wrote:   
      
   > "David J. Hughes"  wrote in message news:w2PVv.315284$y33.307835@fx28.iad...   
   >   
   > On 9/27/2014 10:41 AM, Wayne wrote:   
      
      
   >> # To restrict a person's rights by virtue of their anatomy is as primitive   
   >> # and indefensible as restricting their rights by virtue of their religion   
   >> # or skin colour.   
   >>   
   >> Funny you mention religion.  You know damned well that same sex   
   >> "marriage" is a direct attack on religious beliefs.   
   >   
   >   
   > # How do you figure that?   
   > # As along as Bob and Bill, or Jane and Amy, aren't married in your   
   > # church, how does that affect or harm you, your church or your beliefs?   
   >   
   > It equates homosexuality with hetero marriage.  Some churches object to   
   > that.   
      
   As long as these couples do not insist on getting married in   
   those churches, why should they be bothered?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)