XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
XPost: alt.survival
From: fmhlaw@comcast.net
On 9/30/2014 6:41 PM, Wayne wrote:
>
>
> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
> news:lkim2a5da62hdaq7rrjt4p8b4leuhd4jrl@4ax.com...
>
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:50:00 -0700, "Wayne"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>> news:8scm2ah87nmqg5smgf28h35ur47qkf5n11@4ax.com...
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:36:48 -0400, WangoTango
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <5426724f$0$27326$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>> On 9/26/2014 10:27 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>> > In article <54234070$0$1917$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>> > fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>> >> On 9/24/2014 3:59 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>> >>> In article , mygarbagecan@verizon.net
>>>> >>> says...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> "David J. Hughes" wrote in message
>>>> >>>> news:HdzUv.240259$JH1.29846@fx08.iad...
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On 9/23/2014 12:57 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> >>>>> On 9/23/2014 11:27 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> La. state judge: Gay marriage ban unconstitutional
>>>> >>>>>> Sept 22 2014
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage is
>>>> >>>>>> unconstitutional, in part because it
>>>> >>>>>> violates equal protection rights, a state
>>>> >>>>>> judge ruled Monday.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Protection of what right?
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> # Fourteenth Amendment, section one
>>>> >>>> # "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and
>>>> >>>> subject to
>>>> >>>> # the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
>>>> and >>>> of
>>>> >>>> the
>>>> >>>> # State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any
>>>> law
>>>> >>>> which
>>>> >>>> # shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>> >>>> United
>>>> >>>> # States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty,
>>>> >>>> or
>>>> >>>> # property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person
>>>> >>>> within its
>>>> >>>> # jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> # Contract laws, of which marriage laws are a subset, should not
>>>> >>>> # discriminate on anything other than the ability to consent or
>>>> >>>> enter into
>>>> >>>> # a valid contract.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Nice cite. Too bad it isn't relevant except in the strange
>>>> minds >>>> of
>>>> >>>> proggies.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and man B has
>>>> the
>>>> >>>> right to
>>>> >>>> marry a woman.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man A has a right
>>>> >>>> to marry
>>>> >>>> man B?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Because there is nothing stopping them from any other type of
>>>> >>> contractual agreement, duh.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >> Sure there is. Many types of contracts are void on public policy
>>>> >> grounds.
>>>> >
>>>> > Ah, you got a hair splitter for Christmas, how nice.
>>>> > How about they are afforded equal protection under the law.
>>>> >
>>>> They already are. They always have been. A person's right to marry is
>>>> not affected by sexual orientation. A man can marry a woman, and a
>>>> woman marry a man, regardless of whether either or both of them is
>>>> heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or any other ___sexual you care to
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> # It's routine for the bigots to make that claim.
>>
>> So "bigot" equals someone who doesn't agree with you?
>
> # No. Bigot is someone who makes silly claims to justify their refusal to
> # treat others the way they are treated under the law. fmhlaw@comcast.net
> # is one such bigot.
>
> OK, so someone who disagrees with you is a bigot and makes silly claims?
>
It sounds like in his book, someone who points out a virtually universal
historical truth as old as the institution of marriage itself, that
contradicts what in his mind is "how things should be", is a bigot
making silly claims.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
