XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
XPost: alt.survival
From: me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Just Wondering" wrote in message
news:542c8bee$0$16342$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
> On 10/1/2014 2:38 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Just Wondering wrote in
>> news:542c5f8d$0$1917$882e7ee2
>> @usenet-news.net:
>>
>>> On 10/1/2014 11:01 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote in
>>>> news:XnsA3B8D3316F71Anoemailattnet@216.196.121.131:
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It sounds like in his book, someone who points out a virtually
>>>>>> universal historical truth as old as the institution of marriage
>>>>>> itself, that contradicts what in his mind is "how things should be",
>>>>>> is a bigot making silly claims.
>>>>> What is that "historical truth"?
>>>>> Arranged marriage?
>>>>> Forced marriage?
>>>>> Polygamous marriage?
>>>>> Child marriage?
>>>> Among others.
>>>>
>>> Do y'all really lose track of a thread's subject so quickly? I had
>>> pointed out that marriage is between a man and a woman.
>>
>> Or a man and a girl. Or a widow and her
>> brother in law. Or a man and many women.
>>
> All of which are just special cases of a man and a woman:
> A man and a young woman.
> A man and a widowed woman.
> A man and a woman. The same man and a (second) woman.
> Never a man and a man. Never a woman and a woman.
Really? If you have a man and two women who are married.......aren't the two
women also married to each other as well as the man?
If you have 6 men and 9 women in a group marriage.....who is married to whom
if you're going to claim they can only exist in a marriage that can only
exist as a couple of 1 man and 1 woman?
Men = A, B, C, D, E, & F
Women = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Please list the couples that you claim would only be married to each other.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
