XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: Klausschadenfreude@gmx.com   
      
   On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 20:05:48 -0600, deep wrote:   
      
   >On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 21:50:37 -0400, "Scout"   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>"deep" wrote in message news:8lap2aleg8u57h9eb5jg3rid0m6tma9u9b@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:53:29 -0400, "Scout"   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> No, think about it for a second. Even by your own example, a man and a   
   >>>>>> woman marry....now THEY (as a group) marry another woman. That's a   
   >>>>>> marriage but it no longer consists of one man and one woman, but rather   
   >>>>>> it's a man and a woman marrying another woman.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> No, NO, NO!!! That's NOT what happens.  In polygyny it's NOT a man and a   
   >>>>> woman marrying another woman.  Its' a man marrying a woman, then the   
   >>>>> same   
   >>>>> man marrying another woman.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>So you're saying that if one wife has no duties, obligations, commitments,   
   >>>>etc to the other wife?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>That if one wife dies the other wife doesn't inherit anything, doesn't get   
   >>>>any custody over the children of the other wife, etc?   
   >>>   
   >>> Not legally, no.   
   >>   
   >>Really? So where polygamy is legal you claim that one wife has none of these   
   >>things?   
   >   
   >Polymamy is not legal anywhere in the United States.    It was legal   
   >in Utah until they had to give it up to get statehood.   
      
      
   And of course you believe it should be legal now, just like "gay   
   marriage," right?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)