XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
XPost: alt.survival
From: me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Just Wondering" wrote in message
news:542df985$0$3669$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
> On 10/2/2014 4:07 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Just Wondering" wrote in message
>> news:542d176f$0$27300$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
>>> On 10/1/2014 7:16 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:16:20 -0600, Just Wondering
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/1/2014 2:53 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote in news:542c5f8d$0$1917
>>>>>> $882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/1/2014 11:01 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:XnsA3B8D3316F71Anoemailattnet@216.196.121.131:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:542b5c88$0$4889$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9/30/2014 6:41 PM, Wayne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:lkim2a5da62hdaq7rrjt4p8b4leuhd4jrl@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:50:00 -0700, "Wayne"
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8scm2ah87nmqg5smgf28h35ur47qkf5n11@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:36:48 -0400, WangoTango
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5426724f$0$27326$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2014 10:27 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <54234070$0$1917$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/24/2014 3:59 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mygarbagecan@verizon.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "David J. Hughes" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:HdzUv.240259$JH1.29846@fx08.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2014 12:57 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2014 11:27 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> La. state judge: Gay marriage ban unconstitutional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept 22 2014
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unconstitutional, in part because it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violates equal protection rights, a state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> judge ruled Monday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection of what right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Fourteenth Amendment, section one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and subject to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
>>>>>> States
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person within its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Contract laws, of which marriage laws are a subset,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not # discriminate on anything other than the ability to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consent or enter into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # a valid contract.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice cite. Too bad it isn't relevant except in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minds >>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proggies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry a woman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to marry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man B?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is nothing stopping them from any other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contractual agreement, duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure there is. Many types of contracts are void on public
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy grounds.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, you got a hair splitter for Christmas, how nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about they are afforded equal protection under the law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They already are. They always have been. A person's right
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry is not affected by sexual orientation. A man can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman, and a woman marry a man, regardless of whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both of them is heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ___sexual you care to name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> # It's routine for the bigots to make that claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So "bigot" equals someone who doesn't agree with you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # No. Bigot is someone who makes silly claims to justify their
>>>>>>>>>>> refusal to # treat others the way they are treated under the
>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net # is one such bigot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, so someone who disagrees with you is a bigot and makes silly
>>>>>>>>>>> claims?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It sounds like in his book, someone who points out a virtually
>>>>>>>>>> universal historical truth as old as the institution of marriage
>>>>>>>>>> itself, that contradicts what in his mind is "how things should
>>>>>>>>>> be",
>>>>>>>>>> is a bigot making silly claims.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
