XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
XPost: alt.survival
From: me4guns@centurylink.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Just Wondering" wrote in message
news:542e5fcd$0$4789$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
> On 10/2/2014 7:46 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Just Wondering" wrote in message
>> news:542df985$0$3669$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
>>> On 10/2/2014 4:07 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Just Wondering" wrote in message
>>>> news:542d176f$0$27300$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
>>>>> On 10/1/2014 7:16 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:16:20 -0600, Just Wondering
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 10/1/2014 2:53 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote in news:542c5f8d$0$1917
>>>>>>>> $882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/1/2014 11:01 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsA3B8D3316F71Anoemailattnet@216.196.121.131:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:542b5c88$0$4889$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/30/2014 6:41 PM, Wayne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lkim2a5da62hdaq7rrjt4p8b4leuhd4jrl@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:50:00 -0700, "Wayne"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8scm2ah87nmqg5smgf28h35ur47qkf5n11@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:36:48 -0400, WangoTango
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5426724f$0$27326$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2014 10:27 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <54234070$0$1917$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/24/2014 3:59 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mygarbagecan@verizon.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "David J. Hughes" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:HdzUv.240259$JH1.29846@fx08.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2014 12:57 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2014 11:27 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> La. state judge: Gay marriage ban unconstitutional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept 22 2014
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unconstitutional, in part because it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violates equal protection rights, a state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> judge ruled Monday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection of what right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Fourteenth Amendment, section one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and subject to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United
>>>>>>>> States
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person within its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Contract laws, of which marriage laws are a subset,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not # discriminate on anything other than the ability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consent or enter into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # a valid contract.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice cite. Too bad it isn't relevant except in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minds >>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proggies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry a woman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to marry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man B?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is nothing stopping them from any other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contractual agreement, duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure there is. Many types of contracts are void on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy grounds.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, you got a hair splitter for Christmas, how nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about they are afforded equal protection under the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They already are. They always have been. A person's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry is not affected by sexual orientation. A man can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman, and a woman marry a man, regardless of whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both of them is heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, or any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ___sexual you care to name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # It's routine for the bigots to make that claim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So "bigot" equals someone who doesn't agree with you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> # No. Bigot is someone who makes silly claims to justify their
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
