XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns
XPost: alt.survival
From: me4guns@vcenturylink.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"Just Wondering" wrote in message
news:542fb5f6$0$21102$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
> On 10/3/2014 7:12 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Just Wondering" wrote in message
>> news:542e5fcd$0$4789$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
>>> On 10/2/2014 7:46 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Just Wondering" wrote in message
>>>> news:542df985$0$3669$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
>>>>> On 10/2/2014 4:07 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Just Wondering" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:542d176f$0$27300$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...
>>>>>>> On 10/1/2014 7:16 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:16:20 -0600, Just Wondering
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10/1/2014 2:53 PM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote in news:542c5f8d$0$1917
>>>>>>>>>> $882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/1/2014 11:01 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>> news:XnsA3B8D3316F71Anoemailattnet@216.196.121.131:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just Wondering wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:542b5c88$0$4889$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/30/2014 6:41 PM, Wayne wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:lkim2a5da62hdaq7rrjt4p8b4leuhd4jrl@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:50:00 -0700, "Wayne"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Free Lunch" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:8scm2ah87nmqg5smgf28h35ur47qkf5n11@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:36:48 -0400, WangoTango
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <5426724f$0$27326$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/26/2014 10:27 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <54234070$0$1917$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fmhlaw@comcast.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/24/2014 3:59 PM, WangoTango wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mygarbagecan@verizon.net says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "David J. Hughes" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:HdzUv.240259$JH1.29846@fx08.iad...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2014 12:57 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/23/2014 11:27 AM, Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> La. state judge: Gay marriage ban unconstitutional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sept 22 2014
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Louisiana's ban on same-sex marriage is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unconstitutional, in part because it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violates equal protection rights, a state
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> judge ruled Monday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Protection of what right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Fourteenth Amendment, section one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> States,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and subject to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> United
>>>>>>>>>> States
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> citizens of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the United
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # States; nor shall any State deprive any person of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> life,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liberty, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # property, without due process of law; nor deny to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> person within its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # Contract laws, of which marriage laws are a subset,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not # discriminate on anything other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consent or enter into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # a valid contract.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nice cite. Too bad it isn't relevant except in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strange
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minds >>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> proggies.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assume that man A has the right to marry a woman, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man B
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry a woman.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In what weird world of logic does that mean that man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to marry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> man B?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is nothing stopping them from any other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contractual agreement, duh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sure there is. Many types of contracts are void on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy grounds.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah, you got a hair splitter for Christmas, how nice.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about they are afforded equal protection under the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They already are. They always have been. A person's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry is not affected by sexual orientation. A man can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marry a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> woman, and a woman marry a man, regardless of whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either or
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
