XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: fmhlaw@comcast.net   
      
   On 10/4/2014 5:47 PM, Scout wrote:   
   >   
   >   
   > "Just Wondering"  wrote in message   
   > news:5430848d$0$4908$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net...   
   >> On 10/4/2014 3:45 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:18:31 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 10/4/2014 2:39 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:35:44 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 10/4/2014 8:05 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:58:12 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 10/4/2014 3:29 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:05:35 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 10/3/2014 7:44 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Everyone in a polygamous marriage is married   
   >>>>>>>>>>> to each other. That means at least some of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> spouse are of the same sex.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That will come as news to every polygamist out there.  Take   
   >>>>>>>>>> for example   
   >>>>>>>>>> a jurisdiction where polygamy is lawful, and a man marries one   
   >>>>>>>>>> wife,   
   >>>>>>>>>> them marries another wife, which makes him a polygamist.  Each   
   >>>>>>>>>> woman has   
   >>>>>>>>>> made a vow to take the man as her husband.  Neither woman has   
   >>>>>>>>>> made a vow   
   >>>>>>>>>> to take the other woman as her wife.  While sex between the   
   >>>>>>>>>> man and each   
   >>>>>>>>>> woman (one at a time, not both at once in the same bed), sex   
   >>>>>>>>>> between the   
   >>>>>>>>>> two women is not part of the deal.  Now, suppose one of the   
   >>>>>>>>>> women wants   
   >>>>>>>>>> out.  She divorces the husband.  She doesn't have to divorce   
   >>>>>>>>>> the other   
   >>>>>>>>>> wife.  So just what did the two women do that makes one woman   
   >>>>>>>>>> the other   
   >>>>>>>>>> woman's spouse?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Who says they arent going to be having a three way?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Don't evade the question.  Just what did the two women do that   
   >>>>>>>> makes one   
   >>>>>>>> woman the other woman's spouse?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Marry into a group.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> They didn't "marry into a group." Each woman had one marriage, to one   
   >>>>>> man.  There was no "Judy, do you take Elaine to be your wife?"   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> They married into a group. They may each have been married to one   
   >>>>> male..but he in turn was married to a group. So they married into a   
   >>>>> group.  Voluntarily and with aforethought.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> You're still evading the question.  OK, so they made choices to become   
   >>>> part of an extended family.  That doesn't explain what makes one woman   
   >>>> the spouse of another woman.  So try again.   
   >>>   
   >>> Where did I make that claim? I said they married into a group.,   
   >>> If they said vows to each other as well as the man..then they would be   
   >>> married all the way across/around.   
   >>>   
   >>> Did they do that? I dont have any idea. Do you?  Cites?   
   >>>   
   >>> Now Ive lived in a threesome for a number of  years (about 20+ yrs   
   >>> ago). We said vows to each other, I to each, they to each.  By our   
   >>> standards..we were "married" to each other.  Did Kodys ladies do that?   
   >>>   
   >> As I've already pointed out more than once, no, the ladies did not say   
   >> vows to each other, only to Kodi.   
   >   
   > How do you know? Where you there?   
   >   
   Robyn married Kodi after the show started.  They showed how it's done on   
   one of the episodes.  Because on more than one other episode, the ladies   
   have said they did not marry each other. Because on another series of   
   episodes, Kodi expressed his great concern that if he died the family   
   would split up because there would be nothing holding the ladies   
   together, which wouldn't be a concern if they had exchanged separate   
   vows with each other.  Because the family is part of a fundamentalist   
   Mormon religious group, the Browns married according to their faith, and   
   in their faith that's not how it's done.  Now, do you have any evidence   
   to the contrary?  Because I've put up, now it's your time to put up or   
   shut up.   
      
   > Besides, vows mean nothing.   
    >   
   Maybe you consider a vow meaningless.  For most people, a vow means a   
   great deal.   
      
      
   > If I marry someone I know is already married then I   
    > do so knowing that I am marrying their existing spouse(s) as well.   
   >   
   Then you're the only one on the planet who knows such a thing.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)