XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.atheism, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: ingilt@yahoo.co.uk   
      
   On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:07:05 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:   
      
   > On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 17:36:51 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 10/4/2014 3:45 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 15:18:31 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 10/4/2014 2:39 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 14:35:44 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 10/4/2014 8:05 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:58:12 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 10/4/2014 3:29 AM, Gunner Asch wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 04 Oct 2014 03:05:35 -0600, Just Wondering   
   >>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 10/3/2014 7:44 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Everyone in a polygamous marriage is married   
   >>>>>>>>>>> to each other. That means at least some of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>> spouse are of the same sex.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> That will come as news to every polygamist out there.  Take for   
   example   
   >>>>>>>>>> a jurisdiction where polygamy is lawful, and a man marries one wife,   
   >>>>>>>>>> them marries another wife, which makes him a polygamist.  Each   
   woman has   
   >>>>>>>>>> made a vow to take the man as her husband.  Neither woman has made   
   a vow   
   >>>>>>>>>> to take the other woman as her wife.  While sex between the man and   
   each   
   >>>>>>>>>> woman (one at a time, not both at once in the same bed), sex   
   between the   
   >>>>>>>>>> two women is not part of the deal.  Now, suppose one of the women   
   wants   
   >>>>>>>>>> out.  She divorces the husband.  She doesn't have to divorce the   
   other   
   >>>>>>>>>> wife.  So just what did the two women do that makes one woman the   
   other   
   >>>>>>>>>> woman's spouse?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Who says they arent going to be having a three way?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Don't evade the question.  Just what did the two women do that makes   
   one   
   >>>>>>>> woman the other woman's spouse?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Marry into a group.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> They didn't "marry into a group." Each woman had one marriage, to one   
   >>>>>> man.  There was no "Judy, do you take Elaine to be your wife?"   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> They married into a group. They may each have been married to one   
   >>>>> male..but he in turn was married to a group. So they married into a   
   >>>>> group.  Voluntarily and with aforethought.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> You're still evading the question.  OK, so they made choices to become   
   >>>> part of an extended family.  That doesn't explain what makes one woman   
   >>>> the spouse of another woman.  So try again.   
   >>>   
   >>> Where did I make that claim? I said they married into a group.,   
   >>> If they said vows to each other as well as the man..then they would be   
   >>> married all the way across/around.   
   >>>   
   >>> Did they do that? I dont have any idea. Do you?  Cites?   
   >>>   
   >>> Now Ive lived in a threesome for a number of  years (about 20+ yrs   
   >>> ago). We said vows to each other, I to each, they to each.  By our   
   >>> standards..we were "married" to each other.  Did Kodys ladies do that?   
   >>>   
   >>As I've already pointed out more than once, no, the ladies did not say   
   >>vows to each other, only to Kodi.   
   >   
   > Cites?   
   >   
   > Then its not a group marriage.   
      
   I find that difficult to believe.   
   It would leave all the women with no rights and claims.   
   Much of the point of a multiple marriage is the enhanced   
   support and security -- without it, what's left?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)