XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: atlas-bugged@invalid.invalid
In article ,
BeamMeUpScotty
wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 6:54 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
> > In article ,
> > BeamMeUpScotty
> > > EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/13/2014 1:50 PM, GOP_Decline_and_Fall wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 13:16:00 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
> >>> >>> .O
> >>> bamaCare.gov>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 10/13/2014 1:09 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
> >>>>> In article ,
> >>>>> Stormin Mormon wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/12/2014 6:48 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >>>>>>> The next question is how much stuff do they infect you or I with when
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>> go to the doctor if they're getting all this from their poor skills?
> >>>>>>> If
> >>>>>>> it's that hard to get Ebola then the medical system must be spreading
> >>>>>>> MRSA and Staph and all kinds of disease to themselves and everyone
> >>>>>>> else
> >>>>>>> in mass epidemics.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is a term "iatrogenic" which is latin for
> >>>>>> "the doctor's fault". It does make me wonder how
> >>>>>> much the hospitals will spread ebola. I've thought
> >>>>>> for a long time that it's wise to avoid hospitals
> >>>>>> whenever possible. Now, more than ever.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With our disinformation government, it falls to
> >>>>>> each person to choose what to believe.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> how strange that the only two protocol breaches in the United States
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> the treatment of Ebola (and the patients have been treated at no less
> >>>>> than three hospitals) is in that state that prides itself on it's low
> >>>>> level of government interference/regulation. I guess it pays to be the
> >>>>> state that creates the most jobs, the least regulation, the lowest
> >>>>> average wages and in the lower tier of education
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Protocols are from the CDC No protocol from the CDC has been shown to
> >>>> have been violated.
> >>>
> >>> Odd how you kooks seem to know the results of the investigation before
> >>> the investigators have completed it.
> >>
> >> If the investigation result are not complete then NO one has been shown
> >> to have violated them.
> >
> > if the protocols weren't violated in Texas, how is it one patient with
> > ebola is sent away after notifying staff that he had just come from
>
> The protocol may NOT have been violated...
sure, ebola may have just spontaneously decided that that particular
hospital was a great place to stage a surprise attack
> because South Africa has NO Ebola yet has it?
and neither do the two other hospitals that treated ebola patients
> Maybe it's like the ObamaRegime protocols for
> shooting at terrorists and it's so complicated that it's getting our own
> people killed?
>
>
> > Africa and how did the nurse get ebola?
>
> Good question it will be interesting to see if she made an error or is
> Ebola easier to catch than we are being led to believe.
>
> > That hasn't happened in any of
> > the other American hospitals treating ebola patients. is Texas just so
> > special that those two incidents only happened there?
>
> How did the Ebola man get to Texas? Did the CDC and the Feds fuck-up?
did the CDC or the Feds fly that man into the United States? did that
man go to a hospital in Texas and tell them he had a fever and had just
come from Africa? Did that hospital send him home with antibiotics?
seems to me it doesn't matter how the man got here, but what didn't
happen in Texas after he got here
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
