home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.new-world-order      You will own nothing... and be happy      25,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,055 of 25,344   
   Malcom "Mal" Reynolds to EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   Re: 'Knuckle-draggers' in liberal utopia   
   03 Nov 14 20:39:00   
   
   XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: atlas-bugged@invalid.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 11/3/2014 12:19 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 11/2/2014 11:04 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>   >>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 11/1/2014 2:32 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:   
   > >>>>>> And as you Liberals say....  "If it saves just one child it's worth   
   > >>>>>> it".   
   > >>>>>>> I love using your own words to inform you....   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> so you believe it's irrational to save a childs life? figures   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Why do Liberals (Obama in particular) NOT want a quarantine that will   
   > >>>> save a child's life?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> why do conservatives want big brother to interfere in the lives of   
   > >>> individuals?   
   > >> I don't think they do, and I know I don't...   
   > >   
   > > really? Kaci Hickox would disagree with you. In fact she should be the   
   > > conservatives next female hero...she stood up to big brother and won   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >  but it's the lesser of two   
   > >> evils and as long as you can ban guns which is a right clearly protected   
   > >> by the constitution then there is NO way that you can say this would be   
   > >> unconstitutional.   
   > >   
   > > but guns aren't banned   
   >   
   > That depends on what guns you want and what ammunition and magazine you   
   > chose to buy and whether you need the gun today or 3 days from now?   
   >   
   > It depends where you live and whether you want to carry that gun and   
   > those rounds of ammunition.   
      
   there is no place in the United States excepting certain government   
   installations that guns are banned but thank you for admitting that guns   
   aren't banned   
      
      
   >   
   > They didn't call for a travel ban so much as a travel quarantine.   
      
   wrong. the conservatives want a travel ban   
      
      
   >   
   > How is a 21day quarantine a travel ban?   
      
   why allow them to travel her only to be put up at government expense for   
   21 days when you can just ban them?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca