IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
112014@news.newsgroupdirect.com> 009daea4
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 11/21/2014 1:13 AM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
> In article ,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/2014 3:09 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/19/2014 2:55 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/19/2014 1:36 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "David Hartung" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:8vednZsllOuyNvHJnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>> On 11/19/2014 08:14 AM, Brent Hasselback wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Despite the deaths of least 12 children from "faith healing"
>>>>>>>>> Christian families in their state, lawmakers and public officials in
>>>>>>>>> Idaho have refused to challenge a state law providing a religious
>>>>>>>>> exemption from manslaughter and murder charges, Vocativ reported.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is an example of a situation in which the parents' right to
>>>>>>>> exercise their religious beliefs violate the rights of another; the
>>>>>>>> child's rights are being violated, and thus First Amendment does not
>>>>>>>> apply.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the children are dead. So what. Period.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Liberals would kill them in the Uterus, the religious parents at least
>>>>>> gave the Children more life than the Liberals would have.
>>>>>
>>>>> and lots more pain...hooray for the conservatives concern for children
>>>>>
>>>> There's no guarantee your life will be painless, A kid I know made it to
>>>> 18 and then got drunk and hit a tree, now he's brain damaged.
>>>
>>> based on the years of stories and efforts to prevent drunk driving, I'd
>>> have to say that he was already brain damaged
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you knew he had only 18 years to be "normal" would you have aborted
>>>> him in the uterus? He'll live the next 40-50 years with brain damage.
>>>
>>> if you knew that he was going to drive drunk and potentially kill others
>>> would you have allowed him to live?
>>>
>> I didn't allow anything and I have no right to stop anyone from living
>> their human life.
>
> and you also apparently have no responsibility to protect innocent human
> lives, do you?
Why no I sure don't otherwise I'd have to destroy abortion clinics and
stop abortion doctors by cutting their hands off, I can't invade peoples
rights because I think they might cause any injury or death. By doing
that I would be violating their rights for something that they have NOT
yet done, and that "is" illegal for me to do.
Besides the kid stole the car. And I can't stop a car theft. Or
drinking by every kid. Their parents need to take that responsibility.
Since the government says they know what's best for kids I see why
parents don't do their job, they have to fight the government and their
kids. SO parents just ignore the kids and leave it to the government.
Once upon a time the government backed up the parents decisions and
parents were king in their home, NOT ANY MORE.
And in the end this kid was 18 and an adult by MY standards and was
expected to act like an adult. The problem isn't me it's you. Allowing
kids to ignore their own family and get abortions at 14 years old and
removing the family structure and replacing with government.
--
*Rumination*
#6 - Socialism is a virtual world that we create. It's as real as living
in a video game.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
