XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.usa.constitution, al   
   .fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con   
      
   On 11/24/2014 6:01 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   > On 11/23/2014 4:37 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:   
   >> On 11/23/2014 12:30 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>> On 11/22/2014 6:51 PM, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:   
   >>>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:29:54 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty   
   >>>>    
   >>>>   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 11/22/2014 8:13 AM, wien9alsergrund@gmail.com wrote:   
   >>>>>> ..... As I keep repeating, clergy should not meddle in politics if   
   >>>>>> they don't want politicians to meddle in religion.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> The first amendment doesn't ban clergy from doing anything....  it bans   
   >>>>> *CONGRESS* from making any laws.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Except congress CAN make laws that apply and are enforced against a   
   >>>> LARGE variety of things related to speech, you moron   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Clergy CAN advocate in sermons----but CAN lose tax exempt status   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Congress cannot bar them from speaking---they CAN bar them from   
   >>>> speaking without being taxed   
   >>>>   
   >>>> SEE?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Feel better now?   
   >>>>   
   >>> They tax people to stop smoking or to force them to buy ObamaCare   
   >>> insurance so taxing people to force Religion   
   >>   
   >> Isn't happening.   
   >   
   > Except as coercion and that is also NOT constitutional when it comes to   
   > government passing laws on religion,   
      
   There is no taxation on people "to force religion."  This is what I mean   
   about you being too stupid and too unhinged for this.  You just start   
   stringing words together thinking you're sounding smart, but they always   
   give you away as a complete fucking moron.   
      
      
   > according to the Liberal   
   > interpretation that says there is a "Separation between Church and   
   > State".   
      
   There is such a separation, and it's a good thing.  All governments   
   should have it - especially those in Muslim countries.   
      
      
   > If you can't have the Ten Commandments in a government building   
   > you also can't have government tax codes inside a church building.   
      
   Does not follow.  Nothing you write ever has a shred of logic in it.   
      
   > The Liberals fail to understand that their "Separation is bidirectional".   
      
   No.   
      
      
   --   
      
   "America's abundance was not created by public sacrifices to 'the common   
   good,' but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own   
   personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes."   
      
   Ayn Rand   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)