IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.usa.constitution, al
.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism
XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration
XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism
XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 11/24/2014 1:31 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On 11/24/2014 9:49 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 11/24/2014 12:27 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>> On 11/24/2014 9:24 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> On 11/24/2014 12:07 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 11/24/2014 9:05 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/24/2014 10:39 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/24/2014 6:01 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2014 4:37 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2014 12:30 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2014 6:51 PM, Yoorghis@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:29:54 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/22/2014 8:13 AM, wien9alsergrund@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ..... As I keep repeating, clergy should not meddle in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> politics if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they don't want politicians to meddle in religion.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The first amendment doesn't ban clergy from doing
>>>>>>>>>>>> anything.... it
>>>>>>>>>>>> bans
>>>>>>>>>>>> *CONGRESS* from making any laws.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Except congress CAN make laws that apply and are enforced
>>>>>>>>>>> against a
>>>>>>>>>>> LARGE variety of things related to speech, you moron
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Clergy CAN advocate in sermons----but CAN lose tax exempt status
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Congress cannot bar them from speaking---they CAN bar them from
>>>>>>>>>>> speaking without being taxed
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> SEE?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Feel better now?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They tax people to stop smoking or to force them to buy ObamaCare
>>>>>>>>>> insurance so taxing people to force Religion
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Isn't happening.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Except as coercion and that is also NOT constitutional when it
>>>>>>>> comes to
>>>>>>>> government passing laws on religion,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no taxation on people "to force religion." This is what I
>>>>>>> mean
>>>>>>> about you being too stupid and too unhinged for this. You just
>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> stringing words together thinking you're sounding smart, but they
>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>> give you away as a complete fucking moron.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ["There is no taxation on people "to force religion.""]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> An example is ObamaCare that is a tax and
>>>>>
>>>>> It is not a tax "to force religion." That was just some bit of
>>>>> bullshit
>>>>> that sounded good to your semi-literate, poorly educated,
>>>>> lunatic-fringe
>>>>> ears, but it's bullshit.
>>>>
>>>> And yet it forced people to pay for things for other people that's
>>>> against the religious tenets and beliefs of the people paying that tax.
>>>
>>> Not the issue. You said it was a tax "to force religion." That doesn't
>>> even mean anything. It's just the rabid raving of a lunatic-fringer.
>>> You really are too stupid for this.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes it forced religion to change their tenets or violate those tenets
>> that they have always had.
>
> That's not what you were saying, but it's *still* wrong. It didn't
> "force religion" to do anything. You wrote,
>
> so taxing people to force Religion [sic] can be done to coerce
> people into a National religion
>
> No, there is no attempt to "coerce people into a national religion."
Sure there is....
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
