IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
122014@news.newsgroupdirect.com> 979f9f33
XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.california, alt.politics.economics
XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism
XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration
XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism
XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival, rec.arts.tv
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 12/5/2014 2:17 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
> In article ,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 12/4/2014 7:50 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/4/2014 2:19 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 12/3/2014 4:51 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/3/2014 11:31 AM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <58c2a$547e9c13$414e828e$23988@EVERESTKC.NET>,
>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/2/2014 8:58 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <73995$547e1a6e$414e828e$17741@EVERESTKC.NET>,
>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/2/2014 10:59 AM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <61ed7$547d0fd5$414e828e$19575@EVERESTKC.NET>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/1/2014 4:31 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <53f8$547d026f$414e828e$13886@EVERESTKC.NET>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/1/2014 3:47 PM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <8eb64$547cb9c5$414e828e$14411@EVERESTKC.NET>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/1/2014 10:49 AM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2014 10:01 AM, CLz6dCxDCFBpU01ZZONL wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TW
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> K@I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.C
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal feeling is that I refuse to participate in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> linked to Affirmative Action, I can't support or pay for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> violation of the U.S. constitution and that sort of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discrimination is against my personal beliefs and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so in other words you refuse to do business with anyone
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hires
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> minority or women
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, that's not what he does at all. Many minority persons
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> women
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hold jobs based on merit, not affirmative action.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how do you tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can usually tell fairly quickly when dealing with them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe you can, but for the rest of us, how do YOU tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have to ask, then you probably never could tell. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> imagine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are always happy with whatever comes your way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what an interesting way of avoiding answering me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't avoid answering you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked how you can tell, all you responded with is typical
>>>>>>>>>>>>> conservative
>>>>>>>>>>>>> verbiage
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No, there was nothing "conservative" about it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sure there was...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, there was nothing "conservative" about it. We're agreed.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wow, what a typical conservative strategy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, nothing "conservative" about that, either.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You hold to an inaccurate and bigoted caricature of conservatives,
>>>>>>>> leading to numerous wrong inferences and conclusions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but I've nailed you perfectly
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, you've missed by a million miles.
>>>>>
>>>>> just gotta love that conservative line
>>>>>
>>>> Liberals profile people.... they categorize them by race, sex and other
>>>> criteria so they can exploit the perceived differences in people and use
>>>> that to create hate and manipulate people to get what the Liberals want.
>>>
>>> so you are admitting by your statement that you are a liberal,
>>> interesting
>>>
>> I'm admitting that Liberals are racists...
>
> by your logic:
>
> Liberals profile people.... they categorize them by race, sex and other
> criteria so they can exploit the perceived differences in people and use
> that to create hate and manipulate people to get what the Liberals want.
>
> you labeled me
> you labeled liberals as racists
>
> you meet and demonstrated all of the criteria you seem to hate.
> congratulations on outing yourself
>
You can deny it, but I pointed out the obvious that you are blinded from
seeing. I don't label you, you did that by profiling people to use
their differences as material to exploit.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
