IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   On 12/11/2014 10:37 AM, Kirby Grant wrote:   
   > On 11-Dec-2014, clairbear  wrote:   
   >   
   >> MattB  wrote in   
   >> news:2anh8adctnqvtq3ota5btlbc1a8nb3js10@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:01:55 -0600, clairbear    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> BeamMeUpScotty >>> NETWORK@IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote in news:5w3iw.726691   
   >>>> $_k.129369@fx16.iad:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> How about the way Mary Landrieu was pitched out on Saturday, she   
   >>>>> deserved that for voting for that piece of shit 2000 page ObamaCare   
   >>>>> tax law....   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Now we just need to rid our selves of the dems in the whitehouse   
   >>>> hopefully the people are smart enough to not vote for Hillary or any   
   >>>> other bozocrat   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Do you believe any Tea Party candidate could win?  Well without   
   >>> establishment Republican support?   
   >>>   
   >>> Tea Part doesn't have the votes or the money.   
      
      
   The Tea Party already won with NO money and their candidates are chosen   
   from the ones already running.  There are NO real "TEA PARTY" candidates   
   because there is no TEA PARTY they are a grass roots group that work in   
   cells like "Al Qaeda cells" and they work to get the candidate that   
   agrees with them(Democrat Libertarian or Republican), they don't work to   
   get "their own" candidate to run.   It doesn't take money to do that way.   
      
   Any candidate can adopt the TEA PARTY by agreeing to the 3 simple ideals   
   of the tea party and NONE are Social issues and none are directed at   
   American voters, instead all the ideals are directed at limiting the   
   government NOT limiting WE THE PEOPLE.   
      
   *A Lean and more efficient government* with less interference and   
   regulation and tax on we the people...   
      
   *National Security* *for* *WE* *THE* *PEOPLE*   
   and NOT National spying *on* we the people, and...   
      
   *Constitutional purity/reality* , we the people want the government   
   politicians to respect and protect and defend the original text of the   
   constitution rather than the Liberal court Interpretation of the   
   constitution, meaning that we want to stop Legislation from the   
   executive branch and Legislation from the Judicial branch and have it   
   constitutionally in the Legislative branch where it belongs, along with   
   following the rest of the constitution.   
      
   NOT a thing about Social programs or limiting the freedoms of the people   
   is there.   
      
      
   If a candidate can commit to that then they'll likely get the TEA PARTY   
   voters since they don't really care what party the candidate is in but   
   rather that they are on the ballot.   
      
   That's a Pragmatists Political Party isn't it?   
      
   The TEA PARTY is set up to do the "very best" with what the system is   
   offering.   That's why in the end they will win.   
      
      
   --   
                        *Rumination*   
   #44 - Love your country, but fear your Government, and when they say   
   we're here from the government and we're here to help....   
    run Forest run.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)