home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.new-world-order      You will own nothing... and be happy      25,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,356 of 25,344   
   The Tucson Twister to EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   Re: Ever wonder which Liberals were the    
   09 Jan 15 17:28:38   
   
   XPost: alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons, alt.revisionism   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration   
   XPost: alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns, misc.survivalism   
   XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: ttt_2@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 1/9/2015 1:52 PM, The Tucson Twister wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> *Ever wonder which Liberals were the dumbest* ?   
   > >>   
   > >>   
   > >> [""""A federal judge tossed out California's silly ban on foie gras   
   > >> today, ruling that federal poultry regulations override state poultry   
   > >> regulations. I'm not entirely sure how I feel about that, despite it   
   > >> leading to a non-stupid outcome. From the Associated Press:   
   > >>   
   > >> U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson permanently blocked the state   
   > >> attorney general from enforcing the law that took effect two years ago,   
   > >> finding that the federal government's authority to regulate foie gras   
   > >> and other poultry products supersedes the state's.   
   > >>   
   > >> California barred farmers from force-feeding birds with a tube, which is   
   > >> how foie gras is produced. The state also banned sales of the delicacy.   
   > >>   
   > >> The federal ruling came in a lawsuit brought by foie gras farmers in   
   > >> Canada and New York and by the Hermosa Beach restaurant Hot's Kitchen.   
   > >>   
   > >> Baylen Linniken wrote about the lawsuit in 2013, confident the ban was   
   > >> legally doomed. He tweeted his "told you so" a little while ago.   
   > >> Regulators and law enforcement officials seemed to have very little   
   > >> interest in actually enforcing the ban, prompting animal rights groups   
   > >> to try to sue restaurants directly for serving it. They lost."""""]   
   > >   
   > > so you are against states rights?   
   >   
   > All Liberals, the Feds are Liberals the California laws were from   
   > Liberals and the Animal rights group suing was Liberal.....   
   >   
   > States rights are fine, in fact I was wondering why the Feds were   
   > involved and then I realized they're Liberals.   
   >   
   > They're all Liberals.   
      
   so you are against states rights and the rights of citizens to make the   
   laws of their states...figures   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca