XPost: alt.law-enforcement, talk.politics.guns   
   From: Klausschadenfreude@gmx.com   
      
   On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 17:28:38 -0800, The Tucson Twister   
    wrote:   
      
   >In article ,   
   > BeamMeUpScotty   
   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 1/9/2015 1:52 PM, The Tucson Twister wrote:   
   >> > In article ,   
   >> >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   >> >  > >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> *Ever wonder which Liberals were the dumbest* ?   
   >> >>   
   >> >>   
   >> >> [""""A federal judge tossed out California's silly ban on foie gras   
   >> >> today, ruling that federal poultry regulations override state poultry   
   >> >> regulations. I'm not entirely sure how I feel about that, despite it   
   >> >> leading to a non-stupid outcome. From the Associated Press:   
   >> >>   
   >> >> U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson permanently blocked the state   
   >> >> attorney general from enforcing the law that took effect two years ago,   
   >> >> finding that the federal government's authority to regulate foie gras   
   >> >> and other poultry products supersedes the state's.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> California barred farmers from force-feeding birds with a tube, which is   
   >> >> how foie gras is produced. The state also banned sales of the delicacy.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> The federal ruling came in a lawsuit brought by foie gras farmers in   
   >> >> Canada and New York and by the Hermosa Beach restaurant Hot's Kitchen.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Baylen Linniken wrote about the lawsuit in 2013, confident the ban was   
   >> >> legally doomed. He tweeted his "told you so" a little while ago.   
   >> >> Regulators and law enforcement officials seemed to have very little   
   >> >> interest in actually enforcing the ban, prompting animal rights groups   
   >> >> to try to sue restaurants directly for serving it. They lost."""""]   
   >> >   
   >> > so you are against states rights?   
   >>   
   >> All Liberals, the Feds are Liberals the California laws were from   
   >> Liberals and the Animal rights group suing was Liberal.....   
   >>   
   >> States rights are fine, in fact I was wondering why the Feds were   
   >> involved and then I realized they're Liberals.   
   >>   
   >> They're all Liberals.   
   >   
   >so you are against states rights and the rights of citizens to make the   
   >laws of their states...figures   
      
   When they go against someone's Constitutional rights.... hell yeah.   
      
   They're usually liberals anyway.   
      
   [newsgroups trimmed]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)