XPost: alt.law-enforcement, talk.politics.guns   
   From: mflannigan@jam.rr.com   
      
   Klaus Schadenfreude wrote   
   >   
   > On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 17:28:38 -0800, The Tucson Twister   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >In article ,   
   > > BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >  > EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 1/9/2015 1:52 PM, The Tucson Twister wrote:   
   > >> > In article ,   
   > >> >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >> >   >> >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >> >   
   > >> >> *Ever wonder which Liberals were the dumbest* ?   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> [""""A federal judge tossed out California's silly ban on foie gras   
   > >> >> today, ruling that federal poultry regulations override state poultry   
   > >> >> regulations. I'm not entirely sure how I feel about that, despite it   
   > >> >> leading to a non-stupid outcome. From the Associated Press:   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson permanently blocked the state   
   > >> >> attorney general from enforcing the law that took effect two years ago,   
   > >> >> finding that the federal government's authority to regulate foie gras   
   > >> >> and other poultry products supersedes the state's.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> California barred farmers from force-feeding birds with a tube, which   
   is   
   > >> >> how foie gras is produced. The state also banned sales of the delicacy.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> The federal ruling came in a lawsuit brought by foie gras farmers in   
   > >> >> Canada and New York and by the Hermosa Beach restaurant Hot's Kitchen.   
   > >> >>   
   > >> >> Baylen Linniken wrote about the lawsuit in 2013, confident the ban was   
   > >> >> legally doomed. He tweeted his "told you so" a little while ago.   
   > >> >> Regulators and law enforcement officials seemed to have very little   
   > >> >> interest in actually enforcing the ban, prompting animal rights groups   
   > >> >> to try to sue restaurants directly for serving it. They lost."""""]   
   > >> >   
   > >> > so you are against states rights?   
   > >>   
   > >> All Liberals, the Feds are Liberals the California laws were from   
   > >> Liberals and the Animal rights group suing was Liberal.....   
   > >>   
   > >> States rights are fine, in fact I was wondering why the Feds were   
   > >> involved and then I realized they're Liberals.   
   > >>   
   > >> They're all Liberals.   
   > >   
   > >so you are against states rights and the rights of citizens to make the   
   > >laws of their states...figures   
   >   
   > When they go against someone's Constitutional rights.... hell yeah.   
   >   
   > They're usually liberals anyway.   
   >   
   > [newsgroups trimmed]   
      
   It's a fact.   All you deep southern cocksuckers want is gun rights and Jesus.   
   And Jeesus was never an American.   
      
   James Porter, the head of the NRA doesn't attend Church because he's a Godless   
   Cocksucker like Ayn Rand.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)