XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
    wrote:   
      
   > On 1/15/2015 8:26 PM, nickname unavailable wrote:   
   > > no matter how the right to work for less, laffer curve, low tax utopias try   
   > > to stop solar,   
   >   
   >   
   > Build the Keystone XL pipe line and it uses Solar/Wind on the grid for   
   > power to pump the oil through the pipe.   
   >   
   > The irony is that the expensive solar energy drives up the cost of   
   > transporting the oil through the pipeline.   
   >   
   > It will also make transporting oil more carbon neutral than any other   
   > form of transportation according to the eco-Socialists.   
      
   so if the pipeline isn't built, that means it will be   
   carbon-negative...that should make you even happier   
      
      
    So that "if for   
   > no other reason" Obama with his anti fossil agenda should want the pipe   
   > line since solar and wind are part of the Grid and would be used to pump   
   > the oil through the pipe.   
      
   therefore not pumping the oil thru the pipeline will mean there is more   
   electricity available for the factories that produce products lowering   
   the cost of production   
      
      
   >   
   > Like "electric cars" that Obama was in favor of giving out subsidies to   
   > coerce you to buy.   
      
   subsidies coerce? LOL   
      
      
    All that adds up to Obama's stand on the Keystone   
   > Pipe line contradicting to his normal stand on the use of GREEN ENERGY   
   > for TRANSPORTATION rather than using fossil fuel for transportation.   
   > And one of the best places for that Green Energy to save the most carbon   
   > would be in bulk shipping of commodities. SO in Obamaville the Federal   
   > Government should be subsidizing that Keystone pipeline, NOT stopping   
   > the pipeline.   
      
   so a subsidy for the pipeline is not coercion, but for electric cars is?   
      
      
    There is a duplicitous and ulterior motive for Obama to   
   > be sabotaging the pipe line deal....   
   >   
   > So why is Obama Opposing what is the very thing he usually supports, he   
   > supports the use of GREEN ENERGY over fossil.   
   >   
   > Apparently Obama isn't getting his pocket full of silver for this   
   > particular pipeline, sounds like someone didn't want to pay into the   
   > Democrats re-election campaigns and Obama is punishing them for their   
   > refusal to pay off Obama and Democrats.   
      
   don't worry, those "donations" will find their way into your favorite   
   conservative candidates...sooner or later and then they can engage in   
   duplicitous and ulterior motives   
   >   
   > It's plain old quid-pro-quot. Follow the money.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|