home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.new-world-order      You will own nothing... and be happy      25,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,498 of 25,344   
   BeamMeUpScotty to Josh Rosenbluth   
   The *Federal Jurisdiction does NOT exist   
   22 Jan 15 13:51:03   
   
   IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   On 1/21/2015 1:28 PM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   > On 1/21/2015 12:48 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >> On 1/21/2015 11:52 AM, Josh Rosenbluth wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> You can keep people out of your house because they are Muslim or   
   >>>> Jehovah's Witness....  and invite Catholics in, if you so choose.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yes, because who you choose to associate with is an expression of your   
   >>> beliefs as a person.   
   >>   
   >> The same for art, which is a business.   
   >   
   > I agree that would be an exception to anti-discrimination law under   
   > Freedom of Speech.   
   >   
   >> Does the Black dry cleaners "BY LAW" have to take in and clean the KKK   
   >> uniform of the Grand Wizard?  Is the Black hardware store owner forced   
   >> to sell rope to the KKK when that rope can or will be used to hang a   
   >> black in effigy at the KKK rally later that day?   
   >   
   > Likely no because in most states, you can discriminate on the basis of   
   > political belief.  But, I do believe there are a couples of states where   
   > you cannot - and in those states you have to serve the KKK.   
   >   
   >> The private owners are the only ones that can determine how and why they   
   >> should exclude something from their business.  It's only the business of   
   >> government *when the business decides* "to sell something to someone".   
   >> There is no commerce when someone is NOT allowed to buy or when the   
   >> Store has decided not to sell something.   
   >   
   > In all these case, *the business is selling* to the general public -   
   > except for blacks, gays, etc.  Once they serve the general public, the   
   > government has jurisdiction.   
      
   NO it doesn't have Jurisdiction over NON customers.  You ignore the   
   latest ruling by Justice Roberts on Commerce and that ruling was in   
   ObamaCare "being a Commerce law" and it limited the Commerce clause when   
   they rejected that clause as having "delegated power" over a NON   
   commerce activity. (like NOT buying health insurance)   
      
   No jurisdiction over "NON commerce" and the idiot "Justice Roberts" that   
   found ObamaCare constitutional wrote that in his ruling to explain why   
   ObamaCare is a tax law *NOT a commerce law* .   
      
   Justice Roberts found that *NOT BUYING* was NOT commerce in the courts   
   decision on ObamaCare, that's why *they made ObamaCare a tax* while it   
   was in the hands of the supreme court.   
      
   That said, it means that NON commerce of limiting your customers by   
   declaring them non customers means they are NOT and never were involved   
   in commerce with you.   
      
   That means the *Federal Jurisdiction does NOT exist* under the commerce   
   clause, to allow any commerce laws to stop private business discrimination.   
      
   That kills the Federal Fair Housing Act also....  It may have killed the   
   ACORN style law suits against private mortgage companies under the (CRA)   
   Community Reinvestment Act.   
      
   OOOops the Supreme Court has fucked the Liberals.   
      
      
   )   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca