IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement   
   XPost: alt.prisons, alt.revisionism, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime   
   XPost: alt.politics.guns, misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: alt.survival   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   > jim <""sjedgingN0Sp\"@m@mwt.net"> wrote in   
   > news:maik5o$e8n$1@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   >> GOP_Rise_and_Conquer wrote:   
   >>> jim <""sjedgingN0Sp\"@m@mwt.net"> wrote in   
   >>> news:mag4if$nt9$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>   
   >>>> BeamMeUpScotty wrote:   
   >>>>> On 1/30/2015 8:17 AM, GOP_Rise_and_Conquer wrote:   
   >>>>>> jim <""sjedgingN0Sp\"@m@mwt.net"> wrote in   
   >>>>>> news:mafuuh$19g$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> GOP_Rise_and_Conquer wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> jim <""sjedgingN0Sp\"@m@mwt.net"> wrote in   
   >>>>>>>> news:maarkj$qb9$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Don Kresch wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You can't cite a law making private fire departments illegal,   
   >>>>>>>>>>         It is the nature of the government-monopoly. And, as   
   >>>>>>>>>>         only   
   >>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>> government fire departments or water utilities legally have   
   >>>>>>>>>> access   
   >>> to   
   >>>>>>>>>> the fire hydrants......   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Why can't the for-profit fire dept supply   
   >>>>>>>>> their own water? Wouldn't it be crony   
   >>>>>>>>> capitalism if the govt gave it water?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> The simple fact is competition makes sense   
   >>>>>>>>> in some circumstances and is just plain stupid in   
   >>>>>>>>> other circumstances.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> If your house has a multiplicity of service providers   
   >>>>>>>>> who supply it with electric, water, roads, fire   
   >>>>>>>>> protection etc. That does not benefit the household.   
   >>>>>>>>> Competition in those circumstances is just a recipe   
   >>>>>>>>> for poor service at higher costs.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Really? You think competition for electric and water supplies is   
   >>>>>>>> bad? Sart thinking comrade.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I would be very surprised if you have more than one power   
   >>>>>>> or water supply hooked up to your house. The reason   
   >>>>>>> you don't get to choose between multiple service providers   
   >>>>>>>     is because that would be stupid.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes Tovarich, competition is stupid. As are you.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I can choose Cable or phone line internet and TV or Dish TV   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And that is pretty stupid also. If you were in a nation   
   >>>> where high speed communications network is treated   
   >>>> as basic infrastructure just like water and power   
   >>>> you would get faster service at much lower cost.   
   >>>   
   >>> Yeah, because putting the goverbment in charge of the internet is the   
   >>> best idea ever.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Who said anything about the govt in charge of the   
   >> internet?   
   >> We are talking about what method of constructing   
   >> basic infrastructure gives the best service at the   
   >> lowest cost.   
   >>   
   >> Its not a question of which brand of pizza you   
   >> choose to have delivered, it's about about who   
   >> builds the infrastructure used by the pizza delivery   
   >> guy.   
      
   The business paid for it when they bought the business, the area it is   
   in and the price are directly connected.  The price and infrastructure   
   are what the business is and it paid for and created the infrastructure   
   like it's parking lot that it owns and the quality of it's building that   
   it maintains.  That is also linked to the taxes it pays.   
      
   The cost you pay to buy the business is reflected in the amount the   
   business has already invested in all that.  A farm may have been there   
   100 years and the original road made by the farmer taking his product to   
   market in town....  that road access and that water and all that the   
   farm is, is in the price you pay for it today when you go buy it. So   
   when you buy the farm, you pay for all that infrastructure that the   
   farmer built even if the government took it over and claims it as theirs.   
      
   I worked building apartments and my company that built the apartments   
   was only allowed to build the apartments if we also built the road,   
   sidewalks sewer lines etc. leading up to our parking LOT and the end of   
   the property.  I know I was Quality control as the contractor/supervisor   
   on the Job.   
      
   That wasn't government that built the access, that was the private land   
   owner that built it.  We built the curb and side walks too. We installed   
   a sewage lift station....  We put the asphalt down.   
      
   Government didn't build that.... And in fact the property owner paid for   
   it so it became part of the cost of the business who did pay for it.   
      
   It sure is funny to see Liberals that have never been in business and   
   don't know shit about economics try to explain how business works and   
   how government is the only thing that makes business possible and how   
   government pays for everything.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)