IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.   
   BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
      
   On 2/8/2015 8:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   >    EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 2/8/2015 6:24 PM, wy wrote:   
   >>> There is no "nuclear" family.  It's a phony concept concocted by right   
   >>> wingnuts, religious wackos and homophobes to lamely try to lay total claim   
   >>> to  marriage for themselves by denying it to anyone who doesn't fall under   
   >>> their artificial definition of it.   
   >>   
   >> There are NO gay persons they're a mythical creature, they are just like   
   >> people that prefer Polygamy and incestuous sex....  they have a kinky or   
   >> strange sexual desire.  NO big deal but gays don't have special   
   >> constitutional rights any more than any other sexual desire does....   
   >> incestuous people can't marry, why should gays?   
   >   
   > gays haven't asked for special constitutional rights.   
      
   Sure they are, they want "gay persons" to marry and to keep "polygamist   
   persons" and "incestuous persons"  and pedophiles from marrying.   
      
   That looks like a "special" constitutional right to me.  Why do gay have   
   more rights than polygamists and incestuous persons?   
      
      
   > they are just   
   > asking for the same rights that your mythical nuclear family gets.   
      
   Sad you have to start calling the nuclear family a myth just because you   
   saw me explain that gays are NOT gay persons and that it's a myth.   
   But then I explained why "a gay person" is a myth.   
      
      
   How can gays be a person and a Vanilla ice cream person NOT be a real   
   person with all the rights of a gay person? Explain that to support your   
   supposition that gay persons aren't a myth. All you do is that childish   
   school yard thing where you call someone else the same name.   
      
   How does liking gay sex make you become a person while liking Vanilla   
   ice cream doesn't make you a Vanilla ice cream person? Suppose you like   
   having sex with another person that likes Vanilla ice cream and you only   
   have sex with them if you have Vanilla ice cream...  does that make you   
   a vanilla ice cream person with the same rights as a gay person?   
      
   If NOT then why not?   
      
      
      
   --   
    Austerity is what happens when Socialists run out of other   
   people's money.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)