XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/8/2015 8:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/8/2015 6:24 PM, wy wrote:   
   > >>> There is no "nuclear" family.  It's a phony concept concocted by right   
   > >>> wingnuts, religious wackos and homophobes to lamely try to lay total   
   > >>> claim   
   > >>> to  marriage for themselves by denying it to anyone who doesn't fall   
   > >>> under   
   > >>> their artificial definition of it.   
   > >>   
   > >> There are NO gay persons they're a mythical creature, they are just like   
   > >> people that prefer Polygamy and incestuous sex....  they have a kinky or   
   > >> strange sexual desire.  NO big deal but gays don't have special   
   > >> constitutional rights any more than any other sexual desire does....   
   > >> incestuous people can't marry, why should gays?   
   > >   
   > > gays haven't asked for special constitutional rights.   
   >   
   > Sure they are, they want "gay persons" to marry and to keep "polygamist   
   > persons" and "incestuous persons"  and pedophiles from marrying.   
      
   no they don't. they want the right for same sex couples to marry, which   
   is an entirely different thing   
      
      
   >   
   > That looks like a "special" constitutional right to me.  Why do gay have   
   > more rights than polygamists and incestuous persons?   
      
   why do they have less rights than sterile heterosexual couples?   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > > they are just   
   > > asking for the same rights that your mythical nuclear family gets.   
   >   
   > Sad you have to start calling the nuclear family a myth just because you   
   > saw me explain that gays are NOT gay persons and that it's a myth.   
   > But then I explained why "a gay person" is a myth.   
      
   maybe you are right, there are only people and people should have the   
   right to marry, but the nuclear family is a myth, what you described was   
   the modernist family   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > How can gays be a person and a Vanilla ice cream person NOT be a real   
   > person with all the rights of a gay person?   
      
   exactly   
      
    Explain that to support your   
   > supposition that gay persons aren't a myth. All you do is that childish   
   > school yard thing where you call someone else the same name.   
      
   if people discriminate against a group of people and call that group   
   "gay" there must therefore be a group/class of people that are "gay"   
      
      
   >   
   > How does liking gay sex make you become a person while liking Vanilla   
   > ice cream doesn't make you a Vanilla ice cream person?   
      
   how does heterosexual sex make you a person?   
      
      
    Suppose you like   
   > having sex with another person that likes Vanilla ice cream and you only   
   > have sex with them if you have Vanilla ice cream...  does that make you   
   > a vanilla ice cream person with the same rights as a gay person?   
   >   
   > If NOT then why not?   
      
   I'm lactose intolerant   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)