XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid
In article ,
BeamMeUpScotty
wrote:
> On 2/8/2015 6:24 PM, wy wrote:
> > There is no "nuclear" family. It's a phony concept concocted by right
> > wingnuts, religious wackos and homophobes to lamely try to lay total claim
> > to marriage for themselves by denying it to anyone who doesn't fall under
> > their artificial definition of it.
>
> There are NO gay persons they're a mythical creature, they are just like
> people that prefer Polygamy and incestuous sex.... they have a kinky or
> strange sexual desire. NO big deal but gays don't have special
> constitutional rights any more than any other sexual desire does....
> incestuous people can't marry, why should gays?
incest is a choice, homosexuality isn't.
>
> Gays would stop someone from marrying who they love simply because it's
> that persons brother or sister or mother or father...
can you provide one instance of that happening?
isn't that just as
> discriminating as someone saying gays have no right to marry?
>
> Suppose someone that likes incest wants to marry and they say gays
> shouldn't be allowed to marry? Are they a homophobe wacko?
they are probably just a christian
>
> *GAYS ARE INCESTUOPHOBIC BIGOTS*
>
> Aren't you telling them the exact same thing about incestuous lovers
> when you don't allow them to marry?
>
> What bunch of gay hypocrites on here. Are all gays such huge
> hypocrites? you think your type of sex is more moral than others.
>
> You hate mongering gay scum.
stop projecting
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
