IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 2/10/2015 2:52 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> In article ,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 2/8/2015 8:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/8/2015 6:24 PM, wy wrote:
>>>>> There is no "nuclear" family. It's a phony concept concocted by right
>>>>> wingnuts, religious wackos and homophobes to lamely try to lay total
>>>>> claim
>>>>> to marriage for themselves by denying it to anyone who doesn't fall
>>>>> under
>>>>> their artificial definition of it.
>>>>
>>>> There are NO gay persons they're a mythical creature, they are just like
>>>> people that prefer Polygamy and incestuous sex.... they have a kinky or
>>>> strange sexual desire. NO big deal but gays don't have special
>>>> constitutional rights any more than any other sexual desire does....
>>>> incestuous people can't marry, why should gays?
>>>
>>> gays haven't asked for special constitutional rights.
>>
>> Sure they are, they want "gay persons" to marry and to keep "polygamist
>> persons" and "incestuous persons" and pedophiles from marrying.
>
> no they don't. they want the right for same sex couples to marry, which
> is an entirely different thing
>
>
>>
>> That looks like a "special" constitutional right to me. Why do gay have
>> more rights than polygamists and incestuous persons?
>
> why do they have less rights than sterile heterosexual couples?
>
>
>>
>>
>>> they are just
>>> asking for the same rights that your mythical nuclear family gets.
>>
>> Sad you have to start calling the nuclear family a myth just because you
>> saw me explain that gays are NOT gay persons and that it's a myth.
>> But then I explained why "a gay person" is a myth.
>
> maybe you are right, there are only people and people should have the
> right to marry, but the nuclear family is a myth, what you described was
> the modernist family
>
>
>>
>>
>> How can gays be a person and a Vanilla ice cream person NOT be a real
>> person with all the rights of a gay person?
>
> exactly
>
> Explain that to support your
>> supposition that gay persons aren't a myth. All you do is that childish
>> school yard thing where you call someone else the same name.
>
> if people discriminate against a group of people and call that group
> "gay" there must therefore be a group/class of people that are "gay"
>
>
>>
>> How does liking gay sex make you become a person while liking Vanilla
>> ice cream doesn't make you a Vanilla ice cream person?
>
> how does heterosexual sex make you a person?
>
>
> Suppose you like
>> having sex with another person that likes Vanilla ice cream and you only
>> have sex with them if you have Vanilla ice cream... does that make you
>> a vanilla ice cream person with the same rights as a gay person?
>>
>> If NOT then why not?
>
> I'm lactose intolerant
That makes you and some other lactose intolerant individual have the
same rights as gays have to get married. You can both marry someone of
the opposite gender.
Neither lactose intolerance nor liking homosexual encounters makes you a
gender of your own. And that means there is NO discrimination against
your gender or sexual desire since a desire has no equality, if it did
then polygamists and incestuous sexual desire would also be equal to gay
sex under the 14th amendment.
Gays painted themselves into a corner. Now they are the BIGOTED hate
mongers. Gays are *Incestuophobes* that hate and fear incestuous sex.
--
Austerity is what happens when Socialists run out of other
people's money.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
