IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 2/18/2015 1:50 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> In article ,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/2015 2:41 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/16/2015 2:27 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>> In article <%88Ew.74049$Oy4.8268@fx17.iad>,
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/15/2015 3:36 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>> >>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/14/2015 1:36 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2015 2:21 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2015 8:03 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <8R7Dw.1622854$yK.866365@fx14.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2015 2:00 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2015 7:56 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2015 3:38 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 3:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incest is a choice, homosexuality isn't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you prove that opinion?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is gay NOT a choice and why is incest ONLY a choice?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it follows that if incest is NOT a choice, then gay isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What gender is gay? Male is a gender and female is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't a gender. SO what is gay?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no laws defining male or female so the fact is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no genders, that being said homosexuality is not defined as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a preference for sex with people of the same sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sex with people of the same gender....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but there are no laws defining gender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a men's room and a ladies room and they define who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and how do they define them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does the Olympics determine gender so as to stop men from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dominating
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the woman's games.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who cares? the Olympics committee has no legal standing as a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutional body
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> They can legally keep "you" from competing in a female
>>>>>>>>>>>> competition.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> which affects US Constitutional law how?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You are banned even when the Olympics are in the USA, so it would be
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> treaty.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it would not be by treaty and still has nothing at all to do with US
>>>>>>>>> Constitutional Law. I expected better of you
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The truth is always the truth, it doesn't matter if it's discovered by
>>>>>>>> accident or by genius, it's always the truth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> let us know when you discover it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Olympics must have to have a separate venue for Gays since gays
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> special rights like the Male and Female genders.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what special rights do gays have?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If no one has gay bathrooms special for gays like they do men and
>>>>>>>> women,
>>>>>>>> then gays must NOT have all the rights that those other genders have.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so in your mind gays pee and shit differently than anyone else?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Men use urinals Women don't, that is a gender specific bathroom fixture.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it must hurt to be so wrong
>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
