XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
    wrote:   
      
   > On 2/19/2015 2:04 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > > BeamMeUpScotty   
   > > > EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/18/2015 1:50 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>> >>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/17/2015 2:41 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>> >>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/16/2015 2:27 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <%88Ew.74049$Oy4.8268@fx17.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2/15/2015 3:36 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2/14/2015 1:36 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2015 2:21 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2015 8:03 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <8R7Dw.1622854$yK.866365@fx14.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2015 2:00 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FB   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2015 7:56 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FB   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2015 3:38 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IR   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FB   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 3:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incest is a choice, homosexuality isn't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you prove that opinion?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is gay NOT a choice and why is incest ONLY a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it follows that if incest is NOT a choice, then gay   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What gender is gay? Male is a gender and female is a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gay   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't a gender. SO what is gay?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no laws defining male or female so the fact   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no genders, that being said homosexuality is not   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defined   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a preference for sex with people of the same sex   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sex with people of the same gender....   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but there are no laws defining gender   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a men's room and a ladies room and they define   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and how do they define them?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does the Olympics determine gender so as to stop men   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dominating   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the woman's games.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who cares? the Olympics committee has no legal standing as a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutional body   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can legally keep "you" from competing in a female   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> competition.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> which affects US Constitutional law how?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> You are banned even when the Olympics are in the USA, so it   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> would   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> be   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> by   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> treaty.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|