home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.conspiracy.new-world-order      You will own nothing... and be happy      25,344 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,683 of 25,344   
   Keeley Crawford to EPA.ObamaCare.gov   
   Re: GAYS ARE INCESTUOPHOBIC BIGOTS (1/2)   
   20 Feb 15 11:12:32   
   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/19/2015 2:04 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/18/2015 1:50 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>   >>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/17/2015 2:41 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>   >>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/16/2015 2:27 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <%88Ew.74049$Oy4.8268@fx17.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>   >>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2/15/2015 3:36 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2/14/2015 1:36 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/13/2015 2:21 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>>>>>  NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2015 8:03 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <8R7Dw.1622854$yK.866365@fx14.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/12/2015 2:00 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  FB   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2015 7:56 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  S.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  FB   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/11/2015 3:38 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  IR   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  S.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  FB   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  I.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/2015 3:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incest is a choice, homosexuality isn't.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you prove that opinion?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why is gay NOT a choice and why is incest ONLY a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it follows that if incest is NOT a choice, then gay   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> either   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What gender is gay?  Male is a gender and female is a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gay   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> isn't a gender. SO what is gay?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there are no laws defining male or female so the fact   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no genders, that being said homosexuality is not   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defined   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gender   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a preference for sex with people of the same sex   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sex with people of the same gender....   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but there are no laws defining gender   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a men's room and a ladies room and they define   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and how do they define them?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does the Olympics determine gender so as to stop men   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dominating   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the woman's games.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who cares? the Olympics committee has no legal standing as a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constitutional body   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can legally keep "you" from competing in a female   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> competition.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> which affects US Constitutional law how?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> You are banned even when the Olympics are in the USA, so it   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> would   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> be   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> by   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> treaty.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca