XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/20/2015 2:17 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article <3YqFw.1149732$Ub6.475837@fx20.iad>,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,   
   > >>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>   >>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:   
   > >>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery   
   > >>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there usually   
   > >>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.   
   > >>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they need.   
   > >>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Because there is NO recovery...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> NO "green shoots"   
   > >>>> No "summer of recovery"   
   > >>>> No "Jobless recovery"   
   > >>>> No "stocks led recovery"   
   > >>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"   
   > >>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were   
   happening....   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> There is NO recovery....   
   > >>>   
   > >>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer   
   > >>   
   > >> when did they ever stop getting richer?  The rich didn't have a recession.   
   > >>   
   > >> That's partly why you hate them.   
   > >   
   > > why do you hate the poor?   
   > >   
   >   
   > I've been poor....  and may well be poor again.   
   >   
   > I have no guarantee and it's the Middle class that's being attacked and   
   > robbed by the government.  A Socialist government that then   
   > redistributes middle class money to the top 25.5% of the rich and the   
   > bottom 25.5% of the poor.   
   >   
   > To end up buying off 51% of the voters and effectively destroying the   
   > middle class.  But that's what Socialism is, it's the rich and the poor   
   > and the "government class".   There is NO middle class in Socialism.   
      
   you haven't answered my question   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)