XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>   >>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,   
   > >>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>   >>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery   
   > >>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there usually   
   > >>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.   
   > >>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they need.   
   > >>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> NO "green shoots"   
   > >>>>>> No "summer of recovery"   
   > >>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"   
   > >>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"   
   > >>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"   
   > >>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were   
   > >>>>>> happening....   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> There is NO recovery....   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> when did they ever stop getting richer?  The rich didn't have a   
   > >>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession.  The   
   > >>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't suffer   
   > >>>> a recession.  In fact the Government increased it's deficits and it's   
   > >>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the government. The   
   > >>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?   
   > >>   
   > >> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle class.   
   > >> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed* money   
   > >> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts was   
   > >> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved   
   > >> forward or recovered since the collapse.   
   > >   
   > > "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point, thank   
   > > you   
   > >   
   > Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...   
   >   
   > Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the poor   
   > and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle class.   
   >  But that just what Socialism does.   
      
   so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)