IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> In article ,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>> >>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there usually
>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.
>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they need.
>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were
>>>>>>>> happening....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have a
>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession. The
>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't suffer
>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits and it's
>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the government. The
>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.
>>>>>
>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?
>>>>
>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle class.
>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed* money
>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts was
>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved
>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.
>>>
>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point, thank
>>> you
>>>
>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...
>>
>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the poor
>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle class.
>> But that just what Socialism does.
>
> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start
>
you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.
What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides
for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal
under the law.
The middle class shouldn't be punished and the rich and poor shouldn't
be favored by government, and that's what government under Marxist Obama
is doing.
He's fundamentally changing America from a place where are equal under
the law to a place where we are discriminated against and they call it
Affirmative action under the law.
Changing to Socialism is a fundamental change because you can't have
"Social Justice" and "Equal Justice" at the same time, they're mutually
exclusive.
--
*Rumination*
#47 - ObamaCare is like a box of Cracker Jacks, you had to buy it to
find out what the surprise inside was? It was fractional Slavery "surprise".
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
