XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>   >>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>   >>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>   >>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery   
   > >>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there   
   > >>>>>>>>> usually   
   > >>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.   
   > >>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they   
   > >>>>>>>>> need.   
   > >>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"   
   > >>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were   
   > >>>>>>>> happening....   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer?  The rich didn't have a   
   > >>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession.  The   
   > >>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't   
   > >>>>>> suffer   
   > >>>>>> a recession.  In fact the Government increased it's deficits and it's   
   > >>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the government.   
   > >>>>>> The   
   > >>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle   
   > >>>> class.   
   > >>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed* money   
   > >>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts was   
   > >>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved   
   > >>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point, thank   
   > >>> you   
   > >>>   
   > >> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...   
   > >>   
   > >> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the poor   
   > >> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle class.   
   > >>  But that just what Socialism does.   
   > >   
   > > so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start   
   > >   
   >   
   > you jump to conclusions....  and wrong ones at that.   
   >   
   > What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides   
   > for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal   
   > under the law.   
      
   so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me   
      
   >   
   > The middle class shouldn't be punished and the rich and poor shouldn't   
   > be favored by government, and that's what government under Marxist Obama   
   > is doing.   
      
   right, Obama favors the rich. LOL   
      
      
   >   
   > He's fundamentally changing America from a place where are equal under   
   > the law to a place where we are discriminated against and they call it   
   > Affirmative action under the law.   
      
   affirmative action started long ago, well before Obama. How have you   
   been discriminated against?   
      
      
   >   
   > Changing to Socialism is a fundamental change because you can't have   
   > "Social Justice" and "Equal Justice" at the same time, they're mutually   
   > exclusive.   
      
   and you can't have either at the moment   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)