IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>> >>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there
>>>>>>>>>>> usually
>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.
>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they
>>>>>>>>>>> need.
>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were
>>>>>>>>>> happening....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have a
>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession. The
>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't
>>>>>>>> suffer
>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits and it's
>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the government.
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle
>>>>>> class.
>>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed* money
>>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts was
>>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved
>>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.
>>>>>
>>>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point, thank
>>>>> you
>>>>>
>>>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...
>>>>
>>>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the poor
>>>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle class.
>>>> But that just what Socialism does.
>>>
>>> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start
>>>
>>
>> you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.
>>
>> What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides
>> for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal
>> under the law.
>
> so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me
I believe I said equal under the law... that's being a constitutionalist.
A Socialist or egalitarian seeks to "force" people to become equal
rather than suggesting we are created as equals with no titles of
nobility and from that point we make of ourselves what we can and we're
NOT equal in all areas like political, economic, social, and civil
rights for all people at all times and places. But that *Government*
must treat all persons equally everywhere all the time.
That is different from egalitarians and Socialism that try to make
people all equal in every way all the time and everywhere.
We aren't always equal everywhere and the constitution was written to
recognize that, and then an attempt was tried to refine that first
attempt to get rid of titles of nobility and expand it to make
"GOVERNMENT" treat all people equally.
Unfortunately that has been corrupted by egalitarians and Socialists to
try to *force* all people to be equal all the time and everywhere and
that is a total failure and was always going to fail. The original idea
and the uncorrupted fix had it right. We are all created equal "with no
titles of nobility" and the government should then treat us equally
under the law. The problem is egalitarians and Socialists corrupting
that idea to their own ridiculous idea that all people are equal all the
time everywhere. Which is NOT what the constitution or Amendment 14
says.
SO no I'm NOT egalitarian or Socialist, I actually support the
constitution and NOT the corruption of it.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
