XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/22/2015 1:08 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article ,   
   > >  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >   >  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/21/2015 2:14 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>   >>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/20/2015 7:56 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>   >>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:17 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article <3YqFw.1149732$Ub6.475837@fx20.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>   >>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>>>  BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>   >>>>>>>>>  CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>  A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>  EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> usually   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> need.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were   
   > >>>>>>>>>> happening....   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer?  The rich didn't have a   
   > >>>>>>>> recession.   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> That's partly why you hate them.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> why do you hate the poor?   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I've been poor....  and may well be poor again.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> I have no guarantee and it's the Middle class that's being attacked   
   > >>>>>> and   
   > >>>>>> robbed by the government.  A Socialist government that then   
   > >>>>>> redistributes middle class money to the top 25.5% of the rich and the   
   > >>>>>> bottom 25.5% of the poor.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> To end up buying off 51% of the voters and effectively destroying the   
   > >>>>>> middle class.  But that's what Socialism is, it's the rich and the   
   > >>>>>> poor   
   > >>>>>> and the "government class".   There is NO middle class in Socialism.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> you haven't answered my question   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> You made a statement....  A question doesn't assume fact not in evidence   
   > >>>> to be facts. You need to seek answers in a question NOT give them.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Maybe you'll have better luck forming your next "question".   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> "Why would you hate the poor" would be a proper question.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Notice I simply stated the obvious when I said that "you hate the rich".   
   > >>>>  You have made that clear in the past.  NO question about it.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> so what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander?   
   > >>>   
   > >> I don't hate the rich.   
   > >   
   > > but you accused them of stealing from the gov't and the middle class   
   > >   
   >   
   > I accused the government of stealing from the middle class... the poor   
   > were then paid in bail out money like the rich were bailed out by the   
   > government.   
   >   
   > Superficially for different reasons, but in the end it was just for votes.   
   >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> I also don't hate the poor.   
   > >>   
   > >> I do hate Liars and Socialist government, but that's redundant.   
      
   but the wealthy stole from the gov't   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)