XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
    wrote:   
      
   > On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,   
   > > BeamMeUpScotty   
   > > > EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>> >>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>> >>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> usually   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> need.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were   
   > >>>>>>>>>> happening....   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have a   
   > >>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession. The   
   > >>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't   
   > >>>>>>>> suffer   
   > >>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits and   
   > >>>>>>>> it's   
   > >>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the government.   
   > >>>>>>>> The   
   > >>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle   
   > >>>>>> class.   
   > >>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed* money   
   > >>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts was   
   > >>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved   
   > >>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point, thank   
   > >>>>> you   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the poor   
   > >>>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle class.   
   > >>>> But that just what Socialism does.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.   
   > >>   
   > >> What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides   
   > >> for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal   
   > >> under the law.   
   > >   
   > > so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> The middle class shouldn't be punished and the rich and poor shouldn't   
   > >> be favored by government, and that's what government under Marxist Obama   
   > >> is doing.   
   > >   
   > > right, Obama favors the rich. LOL   
   > >   
   > >   
   > >>   
   > >> He's fundamentally changing America from a place where are equal under   
   > >> the law to a place where we are discriminated against and they call it   
   > >> Affirmative action under the law.   
   > >   
   > > affirmative action started long ago, well before Obama. How have you   
   > > been discriminated against?   
   >   
   > Affirmative Action was always discrimination and I always call it what   
   > it is.   
   >   
   > Every time someone is given priority by the government over my skin   
   > color or gender it's discrimination. Just like all blacks are   
   > discriminated against when one black is denied a government benefit   
   > because they are black.   
   > You can't put the tooth paste back in the tube. And using   
   > discrimination to "fix" past discrimination is like trying to put that   
   > tooth paste back in the tube with your fingers. It's another   
   > Liberal-Democrat failure.   
      
   so how do YOU solve that particular problem?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|