XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid
In article ,
BeamMeUpScotty
wrote:
> On 2/22/2015 2:45 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> > In article ,
> > BeamMeUpScotty
> > > EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,
> >>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>> >>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>> In article ,
> >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>> >>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> usually
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> need.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were
> >>>>>>>>>>>> happening....
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have a
> >>>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession. The
> >>>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't
> >>>>>>>>>> suffer
> >>>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits and
> >>>>>>>>>> it's
> >>>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the
> >>>>>>>>>> government.
> >>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle
> >>>>>>>> class.
> >>>>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed*
> >>>>>>>> money
> >>>>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts
> >>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved
> >>>>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point,
> >>>>>>> thank
> >>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the
> >>>>>> poor
> >>>>>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle
> >>>>>> class.
> >>>>>> But that just what Socialism does.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.
> >>>>
> >>>> What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides
> >>>> for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal
> >>>> under the law.
> >>>
> >>> so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The middle class shouldn't be punished and the rich and poor shouldn't
> >>>> be favored by government, and that's what government under Marxist Obama
> >>>> is doing.
> >>>
> >>> right, Obama favors the rich. LOL
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> He's fundamentally changing America from a place where are equal under
> >>>> the law to a place where we are discriminated against and they call it
> >>>> Affirmative action under the law.
> >>>
> >>> affirmative action started long ago, well before Obama. How have you
> >>> been discriminated against?
> >>
> >> Affirmative Action was always discrimination and I always call it what
> >> it is.
> >>
> >> Every time someone is given priority by the government over my skin
> >> color or gender it's discrimination. Just like all blacks are
> >> discriminated against when one black is denied a government benefit
> >> because they are black.
> >> You can't put the tooth paste back in the tube. And using
> >> discrimination to "fix" past discrimination is like trying to put that
> >> tooth paste back in the tube with your fingers. It's another
> >> Liberal-Democrat failure.
> >
> > so how do YOU solve that particular problem?
> >
> End the government's discrimination.
>
>
> There is NOTHING you can do to end personal likes and dislikes or
> discrimination so all you can do is ignore it.
like you do?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
