IRS.FBI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: I-WAS-JUST-GANG-PROBED-BY-THE-ObamaRegime-SPY-NETWORK@IRS.
BI.NSA.CIA.EPA.ObamaCare.gov
On 2/23/2015 3:25 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> In article <8UqGw.1849134$fW3.1163593@fx05.fr7>,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 2/22/2015 2:44 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>> >>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have a
>>>>>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession. The
>>>>>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> suffer
>>>>>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits and
>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the
>>>>>>>>>>>> government.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the middle
>>>>>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed*
>>>>>>>>>> money
>>>>>>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved
>>>>>>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point,
>>>>>>>>> thank
>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the
>>>>>>>> poor
>>>>>>>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle
>>>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>>> But that just what Socialism does.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides
>>>>>> for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal
>>>>>> under the law.
>>>>>
>>>>> so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me
>>>>
>>>> I believe I said equal under the law... that's being a constitutionalist.
>>>> A Socialist or egalitarian seeks to "force" people to become equal
>>>> rather than suggesting we are created as equals with no titles of
>>>> nobility and from that point we make of ourselves what we can and we're
>>>> NOT equal in all areas like political, economic, social, and civil
>>>> rights for all people at all times and places. But that *Government*
>>>> must treat all persons equally everywhere all the time.
>>>>
>>>> That is different from egalitarians and Socialism that try to make
>>>> people all equal in every way all the time and everywhere.
>>>>
>>>> We aren't always equal everywhere and the constitution was written to
>>>> recognize that, and then an attempt was tried to refine that first
>>>> attempt to get rid of titles of nobility and expand it to make
>>>> "GOVERNMENT" treat all people equally.
>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
