XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
    wrote:   
      
   > On 2/23/2015 3:25 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > > In article <8UqGw.1849134$fW3.1163593@fx05.fr7>,   
   > > BeamMeUpScotty   
   > > > EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >   
   > >> On 2/22/2015 2:44 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>> In article ,   
   > >>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>> >>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>>> On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,   
   > >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>> >>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NS   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CI   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> A.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries, there   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage gains.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening....   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have a   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession. The   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor didn't   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> suffer   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits and   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> it's   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> government.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> The   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.   
   > >>>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't, right?   
   > >>>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the   
   > >>>>>>>>>> middle   
   > >>>>>>>>>> class.   
   > >>>>>>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed*   
   > >>>>>>>>>> money   
   > >>>>>>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the bailouts   
   > >>>>>>>>>> was   
   > >>>>>>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither moved   
   > >>>>>>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point,   
   > >>>>>>>>> thank   
   > >>>>>>>>> you   
   > >>>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...   
   > >>>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the   
   > >>>>>>>> poor   
   > >>>>>>>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle   
   > >>>>>>>> class.   
   > >>>>>>>> But that just what Socialism does.   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start   
   > >>>>>>>   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking sides   
   > >>>>>> for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons" equal   
   > >>>>>> under the law.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I believe I said equal under the law... that's being a   
   > >>>> constitutionalist.   
   > >>>> A Socialist or egalitarian seeks to "force" people to become equal   
   > >>>> rather than suggesting we are created as equals with no titles of   
   > >>>> nobility and from that point we make of ourselves what we can and we're   
   > >>>> NOT equal in all areas like political, economic, social, and civil   
   > >>>> rights for all people at all times and places. But that *Government*   
   > >>>> must treat all persons equally everywhere all the time.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> That is different from egalitarians and Socialism that try to make   
   > >>>> people all equal in every way all the time and everywhere.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> We aren't always equal everywhere and the constitution was written to   
   > >>>> recognize that, and then an attempt was tried to refine that first   
   > >>>> attempt to get rid of titles of nobility and expand it to make   
   > >>>> "GOVERNMENT" treat all people equally.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Unfortunately that has been corrupted by egalitarians and Socialists to   
   > >>>> try to *force* all people to be equal all the time and everywhere and   
   > >>>> that is a total failure and was always going to fail. The original idea   
   > >>>> and the uncorrupted fix had it right. We are all created equal "with no   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|