XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: davidjhughes.tx@netzero.com
On 2/25/2015 1:23 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> In article ,
> BeamMeUpScotty
> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>
>> On 2/24/2015 3:52 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/23/2015 3:21 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/22/2015 2:45 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>> >>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gains.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the workers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's deficits
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> middle
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the printed*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bailouts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "the gov't just stole from the rest of us", so you made my point,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Didn't seem like what you meant but if it was then great...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Government stole from the middle class and redistributed it to the
>>>>>>>>>>>> poor
>>>>>>>>>>>> and the wealthy and the government has nearly crushed the middle
>>>>>>>>>>>> class.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But that just what Socialism does.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so you don't like the wealthy either, good, that's a start
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you jump to conclusions.... and wrong ones at that.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What I said made it obvious that I don't like Government taking
>>>>>>>>>> sides
>>>>>>>>>> for one group over another because that's NOT treating "persons"
>>>>>>>>>> equal
>>>>>>>>>> under the law.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so you are an egalitarian? that sounds like socialism to me
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The middle class shouldn't be punished and the rich and poor
>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't
>>>>>>>>>> be favored by government, and that's what government under Marxist
>>>>>>>>>> Obama
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
