XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid
In article ,
BeamMeUpScotty
wrote:
> On 2/25/2015 3:24 PM, David J. Hughes wrote:
> > On 2/25/2015 1:23 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >> In article ,
> >> BeamMeUpScotty
> >> >> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2/24/2015 3:52 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>> In article ,
> >>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 2/23/2015 3:21 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 2/22/2015 2:45 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic recoveries,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong wage
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gains.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> told were
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening....
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting richer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a recession.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The poor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deficits
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the wealthy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so they must have been stealing the money from the gov't,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if the government was first stealing the money from the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> middle
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that looks like what was happening, *borrowing the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> printed*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> money
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was theft and so the entire collapse and TARP and all the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bailouts
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paid for by the middle class which is why they have neither
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moved
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forward or recovered since the collapse.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
