XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons
XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns
XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival
From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid
In article ,
"David J. Hughes" wrote:
> On 2/26/2015 2:25 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> > In article ,
> > "David J. Hughes" wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/25/2015 7:09 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>> In article <%bqHw.610926$rq4.129886@fx27.iad>,
> >>> "David J. Hughes" wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2/25/2015 1:23 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>> In article ,
> >>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>> >>>>> IA.
> >>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2/24/2015 3:52 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .CI
> >>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2/23/2015 3:21 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> SA.
> >>>>>>>>> CIA
> >>>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2/22/2015 2:45 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> .NS
> >>>>>>>>>>> A.C
> >>>>>>>>>>> IA.
> >>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/22/2015 1:15 AM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <2Y4Gw.83017$Oy4.39216@fx17.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> BI.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NSA
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> .CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/21/2015 2:12 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .FB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.N
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SA.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 7:57 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RS.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .NS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2015 2:16 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article ,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @IR
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.F
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BI.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2015 2:10 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <3xoFw.2191782$1s.1636401@fx05.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BeamMeUpScotty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RK@
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IRS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .FB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NS
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CI
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EPA.ObamaCare.gov> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2015 6:36 PM, davidp@agent.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Economists are baffled about Obama's recovery
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> By Robert J. Samuelson - Jan. 19, 2015
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The great wage mystery deepens. In economic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recoveries,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usually
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes a time when strong job gains lead to strong
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wage
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gains.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Businesses must pay more to recruit and retain the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> workers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not this time - or at least not yet.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is NO recovery...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NO "green shoots"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "summer of recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Jobless recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "stocks led recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "ObamaCare stimulated Recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No "Shovel Ready Jobs Recovery"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or any of the other half dozen recoveries we were told
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> happening....
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is NO recovery....
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there must be a recovery, the 1%er's keep getting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> richer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when did they ever stop getting richer? The rich didn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recession. Just as the government didn't have a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recession.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government just stole money from the rest of us. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> poor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> didn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suffer
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a recession. In fact the Government increased it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deficits
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spending and that proves there was NO recession for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rich got richer so there was NO recession for the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wealthy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
