XPost: alt.politics.economics, alt.law-enforcement, alt.prisons   
   XPost: alt.revisionism, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.true-crime, alt.politics.guns   
   XPost: misc.survivalism, soc.culture.usa, alt.survival   
   From: kcrawford981@gmail.invalid   
      
   In article <7PLHw.6105$Cg3.3037@fx22.iad>,   
    BeamMeUpScotty   
     wrote:   
      
   > On 2/26/2015 3:19 PM, Keeley Crawford wrote:   
   >   
   > >   
   > > what is "maternity" coverage and how many companies offer it?   
      
   what is "maternity" coverage for YOU   
      
      
      
   >   
   > Well... what is a maternity ward and why is there maternity care....   
      
   because heterosexual marriage is so important   
      
      
   >   
   > Obviously insurance covers it since it's mandated and the policy has it   
   > and the hospitals offer it.  It's what ObamaCare is, it's a mandated   
   > minimum coverage. That makes Maternity a tax.   
      
   so you would prefer women that can't afford insurance to give birth   
   under bridges?   
      
      
   >   
   >   
   > maternity   
   >   
   > Also found in: Medical, Legal, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.   
   > ma�ter�ni�ty   
   >  (m?-tžrŒni�-tē)   
   > n. pl. ma·ter·ni·ties   
   > 1. The state of being a mother; motherhood.   
   > 2. The feelings or characteristics associated with being a mother;   
   > motherliness.   
   > 3. A maternity ward.   
   >   
   > > as to having what you want, that's what we call a business opportunity   
   > >   
   >   
   > NO it's called a tax.... where they mandate that you buy what you don't   
   > want.   
   >   
   > And you thought Liberals wanted the GOVERNMENT to stay out of a woman's   
   > uterus, yet here they are mandating insurance coverage for a uterus like   
   > they do a car....   
   >   
   > Is owning a woman's uterus really like owning a car?   
      
   yes, you know how to craft what looks like an analogy, but comparing   
   apples to screwdrivers is like comparing a creationist to Albert Einstein   
      
      
   >   
   > There is your Liberal *WAR ON WOMEN*   
      
   Mandatory ultrasounds   
      
   In 2011 and 2012, "War on Women" was used to describe the legislation   
   passed by many states requiring that women seeking abortions first   
   undergo government-mandated ultrasounds.[53] Some states require that   
   women view the image of the fetus and others require that women be   
   offered the opportunity to listen to the fetal heartbeat. Since many   
   women's pregnancies are not far enough along to get an image via a   
   traditional ultrasound, transvaginal ultrasounds, which involve the   
   physician inserting a probe into the woman's vagina, may be required,   
   but these requirements vary state to state.[54][55] Critics have   
   questioned the value of having a medically unnecessary procedure, and   
   characterized it as similar to some states' legal definition of   
   rape.[56] Writer Megan Carpentier underwent the procedure and indicated   
   that although it was not comparable to being raped, the process was   
   "uncomfortable to the point of being painful, emotionally triggering...   
   and something that no government should force its citizens to undergo to   
   make a political point."[57][58] However, in an article critical of the   
   assumptions of those on both sides of the issue, sociologist Tracy   
   Weitz, who opposes mandatory ultrasound, notes that "the use of trans-   
   vaginal ultrasounds is routine among abortion providers."[59]   
      
      
      
   this is the conservative version of the "WAR ON WOMEN"   
      
      
   >   
   >                      *Rumination*   
   > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHjkgklMtRw   
   > ObamaCare has your number.   
   >   
   > Think about it ladies...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)